MHB Intro to Logic (prove sequents)

  • Thread starter Thread starter kk12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intro Logic
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving specific logical sequents, with participants expressing difficulty in starting the proofs. The first sequent involves demonstrating the relationship between existential and universal quantifiers. The second sequent requires proving the negation of an existential statement based on a universal condition. The third sequent connects the existence of a property with its implication to another property. Overall, the thread emphasizes the challenges of understanding and applying logical proofs in formal logic.
kk12
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am stuck on these questions and don't really know how to start/solve them.
prove the following sequent:
1. $(\exists x) Fx \to (\forall x) Gx \vdash (\exists x)(Fx \to (\forall x)Gx)$

2. $(\forall x)(Fx \to (\forall y)\neg Fy) \vdash \neg(\exists x)Fx$

3. $(\exists x)Fx, (\forall x)(Fx \; à \; Gx) \vdash (\exists x)G$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See this https://driven2services.com/staging/mh/index.php?threads/29/.
 
Greetings, I am studying probability theory [non-measure theory] from a textbook. I stumbled to the topic stating that Cauchy Distribution has no moments. It was not proved, and I tried working it via direct calculation of the improper integral of E[X^n] for the case n=1. Anyhow, I wanted to generalize this without success. I stumbled upon this thread here: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-to-prove-the-cauchy-distribution-has-no-moments.992416/ I really enjoyed the proof...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K