Suggestion Intro to newcomers

  • Thread starter Thread starter pinball1970
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rules
AI Thread Summary
New posters often overlook the forum rules, leading to misunderstandings about acceptable behavior. A summary of the main rules was provided to help newcomers navigate the platform effectively. Contributors are encouraged to engage with existing discussions or start new topics, while being mindful of the site's guidelines. The forum maintains a strict moderation policy, especially against personal theories and non-peer-reviewed work. Overall, the emphasis is on fostering a welcoming environment while ensuring compliance with community standards.
pinball1970
Gold Member
Messages
3,499
Reaction score
5,473
@jedishrfu posted a small summary of the main rules to a new poster.

I think this is a really good idea.

New posters do not read the rules and they get upset when what seems innocuous to them, is an absolute no no to PF.

Cranks, trolls and the like will always be so, but the odd inquisitive chap may get put off early doors when they could have been a contributor.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes symbolipoint, weirdoguy, BillTre and 4 others
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is jedi's reply for reference:

jedishrfu said:
Welcome to PF!

You could browse the thread discussions and see if there any discussion that you can contribute to. As an example, someone posts about relearning classical physics as a senior citizen and you could recommend a good book like Susskind's Theoretical Minimum book on Classical Mechanics.

You could start a discussion on a topic that you'd like to know more about. Tell us what you know and where you get stuck. For example, you might be curious about why special relativity explains the magnetic field when current flows in a straight wire.

---

When asking a question or solving a problem, we may view it as homework because if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we conclude it's a homework problem.

We've had folks present a problem without showing us what they did. We would conclude its homework, and they would say they aren't students. However, we've also had students come here trying to trick us into solving their problems.

---

Lastly, you could browse our site global guidelines. There are some topics we don't discuss. In particular, personal theories, fringe science like perpetual motion machines, impossible spacecraft engines, and several other topics,

We also don't review a person's work, such as an unpublished paper. We are not a peer-review site. We can and do discuss peer-reviewed papers published in respectable journals like Nature. Sometimes, we discuss arxiv papers if the science is mainstream but cutting edge from well-known authors and institutions.

We are a highly moderated site, so read our site's global guidelines to learn more.

Should you see any spam or questionable posts that violate our policies, use the report button to bring them to our attention. We appreciate these heads-up reports. It really helps our moderation efforts to keep the site clean.

Take care and enjoy PF,
Jedi
 
  • Like
Likes weirdoguy, BillTre and pinball1970
It's not natural to read rules for any new platform. We just want to dive right in, so it is on "us" to find ways to inform on expectations here. Every new member also receives a DM with a link to the rules and helpful threads.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes symbolipoint and pinball1970
Greg Bernhardt said:
It's not natural to read rules for any new platform. We just want to dive right in, so it is on "us" to find ways to inform on expectations here. Every new member also receives a DM with a link to the rules and helpful threads.
Fair enough
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Back
Top