Mickey 6
- 0
- 0
- How did you find PF?
- Via Claude
Hi everyone,
I'm a lawyer from southern Indiana with no formal physics background, but I've been fascinated by fundamental physics questions for years. I've recently been exploring some ideas about scale, recursion, and the relationship between quantum mechanics and general relativity, and I've reached the point where I need feedback from people who actually know what they're talking about.
I'm here because I've developed a speculative framework that I'm probably either (a) reinventing badly, or (b) misunderstanding in fundamental ways. Rather than keep refining it in isolation, I want to find out what I'm missing from the literature and if and where my thinking breaks down.
What I'm NOT:
What I AM:
I've found LLMs (Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity) incredibly helpful for articulating and refining ideas, but I've also learned that AI assistance can make bad ideas sound sophisticated without actually making them correct. So I'm here for the reality check.
I'll be posting a framework in the Beyond the Standard Models section soon, but wanted to introduce myself first. Looking forward to learning from this community, even if (especially if) the learning involves understanding why my ideas don't work.
Thanks for having me here.
I'm a lawyer from southern Indiana with no formal physics background, but I've been fascinated by fundamental physics questions for years. I've recently been exploring some ideas about scale, recursion, and the relationship between quantum mechanics and general relativity, and I've reached the point where I need feedback from people who actually know what they're talking about.
I'm here because I've developed a speculative framework that I'm probably either (a) reinventing badly, or (b) misunderstanding in fundamental ways. Rather than keep refining it in isolation, I want to find out what I'm missing from the literature and if and where my thinking breaks down.
What I'm NOT:
- A physicist claiming to have "the answer"
- Someone looking for validation rather than criticism
- Unwilling to be told I'm wrong
What I AM:
- Genuinely curious about whether there's anything interesting in the ideas I've been exploring
- Eager to learn what actual experts think
- Ready to read papers/books people suggest
- Prepared to hear "you're just describing [existing framework X]"
I've found LLMs (Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity) incredibly helpful for articulating and refining ideas, but I've also learned that AI assistance can make bad ideas sound sophisticated without actually making them correct. So I'm here for the reality check.
I'll be posting a framework in the Beyond the Standard Models section soon, but wanted to introduce myself first. Looking forward to learning from this community, even if (especially if) the learning involves understanding why my ideas don't work.
Thanks for having me here.