Quantum Introduction to Quantum Mechanics by Griffiths

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the book "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by David J. Griffiths, highlighting concerns regarding the quality of international editions. Users report that Pearson International copies often suffer from poor binding, missing chapters, and improperly printed mathematical symbols. While some editions may be acceptable, particularly those aimed at the European market, caution is advised when purchasing. Additionally, an alternative recommendation is made for Sakurai's second edition, which includes valuable additional content for beginners.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic quantum mechanics concepts
  • Familiarity with mathematical notation used in physics
  • Knowledge of different book editions and their implications
  • Awareness of international publishing standards
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between international and domestic editions of academic texts
  • Explore reviews of "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by David J. Griffiths
  • Learn about the Aharonov-Bohm effect and its significance in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate alternative quantum mechanics textbooks, such as Sakurai's second edition
USEFUL FOR

Students studying quantum mechanics, educators seeking reliable textbooks, and anyone interested in understanding the nuances of academic publishing in physics.

KT KIM
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I want to study quantum mechanics for undergrad level, and found out really lots of people recommends "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics by David J.Griffiths" which is
51Lj0oHXygL._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

Alright, so I visited my school book store for this cat-pictured book. and found

415iwjPFzDL._SX258_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

this puzzle-pictured book. Same name same author. but not the cat one.

Are these are same books?

I am not in English-using country.
Is it merely just a international edition?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have read that these Pearson International copies of Griffiths texts are terrible. Poor quality binding, out of order, and in some cases missing entire chapters. David Griffith himself posted an apology on his website.

It could just be the Electrodynamics that had this issue. But personally I would be wary.
 
Yes, the international edition is terrible. Many maths symbols are not printed properly or not printed at all.
 
There are two kinds of international editions - the ones that are printed in newsprint paper in India. Other than the paper quality, the book is actually decent and readable Here is how it looks. You can't beat the price $12.90
https://www.amazon.com/dp/9332542899/?tag=pfamazon01-20

However, the one in the second picture is possibly for the European market and is supposed to have much better paper.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Geez.. I never knew this book is that wrong.
However it is really hard to get cat one in my country(too expensive or out of stocks in here s.korea), maybe I should look for other options.
 
Well, I'm not so sure about Griffiths's book, although I've never had too close a look at it. From discussions in this forums it however occurs to me that it is sometimes a bit sloppy in the math leading to some confusion, particularly for beginners. I personally still prefer Sakurai ##\geq 2^{\text{nd}}## edition (because it contains very nice additional chapters on interesting topics like the Aharonov-Bohm effect that are not contained in the 1st edition), from which I once started to learn QM in the theoretical-physics lecture course.
 
i am self learning physics. have you ever worked your way backwards again after finishing most undergrad courses? i have textbooks for junior/senior physics courses in classical mechanics, electrodynamics, thermal physics, quantum mechanics, and mathematical methods for self learning. i have the Halliday Resnick sophomore book. working backwards, i checked out Conceptual Physics 11th edition by Hewitt and found this book very helpful. What i liked most was how stimulating the pictures...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
472
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K