A Introduction to topological field theory?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the connection between cohomology, equations of motion, and topological field theory, particularly in the context of abelian field theories. The action functional, which describes the dynamics of a physical system, plays a crucial role in linking these concepts, with the Lagrangian derived from it encapsulating the system's behavior. The de Rham cohomology is instrumental in analyzing the topological properties and symmetries of the action functional, aiding in the derivation of equations of motion and conserved quantities. Additionally, it helps in understanding the global features of topological field theory, which lacks local degrees of freedom. Overall, the interplay between these mathematical frameworks and physical theories is essential for grasping the underlying principles of topological field theory.
Kris-L
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I have been looking at differential forms, manifolds and de Rham cohomology. Now I'm trying to figure out the connection from cohomology and equations of motions and topological field theory. Problem is that I am only looking at abelian field theories and I only find introductions into non-abelian or/and Lie groups.

Do you have any tips with a easy introduction from the math into the physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks in advance!The best way to understand the connection between cohomology and equations of motion is to look at the action functional. The action functional is a mathematical expression that describes the dynamics of a physical system. It is an integral over a certain space of fields that describes how the system evolves over time. In the case of abelian field theories, the action functional is a complex-valued integral over the space of fields. This integral can be written as the sum of two components: one that depends only on the field values (the "kinetic" term) and one that depends on the derivatives of the field (the "potential" term). The differential form associated with the action functional is known as the Lagrangian. It is the integral of the product of the Lagrangian density (which is a function of the fields and their derivatives) and the volume element of the space of fields. The equations of motion can be derived from the Lagrangian by taking the variational derivatives of the action functional with respect to the fields. These equations of motion are then used to determine the dynamics of the system.The de Rham cohomology is then used to study the topological properties of the system. This involves looking at the symmetries of the action functional and the differentials of the action functional. These symmetries and differentials can be used to understand the conserved quantities of the system and the topological features such as the number of solutions to the equations of motion. It is also possible to use the de Rham cohomology to study the symmetries of the action functional in more detail. This can be used to derive the Ward identities that describe how the equations of motion for a system change under certain transformations. It can also be used to investigate the renormalization group structure of the system. Finally, there is a connection between de Rham cohomology and topological field theory. Topological field theory is a type of quantum field theory which has no local degrees of freedom. Instead, it is characterized by global features such as topological invariants and topological terms in the action functional. The de Rham cohomology can be used to explore these global features and to understand how they are related to the renormalization group structure of the system.
 
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
390
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
416
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
10K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
11K