Introductory Topology online textbook recommendations

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around recommendations for online textbooks on introductory topology, particularly in relation to calculus. Participants explore the connections between calculus concepts and topology, discussing how understanding topology can enhance comprehension of calculus and its applications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to find free online resources that explain the relationship between calculus and topology, noting a lack of connection in their current textbooks.
  • Another participant asserts that continuity is fundamentally linked to topology, referencing the intermediate value theorem as a key example.
  • Several participants discuss the usefulness of topology in proving the existence of solutions to problems, even when explicit solutions are difficult to find.
  • There are mentions of specific textbooks, such as Simmons and Munkres, with varying opinions on their accessibility and effectiveness for learning topology in conjunction with calculus.
  • Some participants suggest alternative texts, including works by Croom, Sutherland, and O'Searcoid, highlighting their readability and approach to metric spaces.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of understanding point set topology, suggesting it is more widely applicable than other advanced topics in topology.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of topology in understanding calculus, but there are multiple competing views regarding which textbooks are most effective and accessible for this purpose. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to integrate topology with calculus studies.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the varying difficulty levels of recommended texts and the potential challenges in understanding topology without guidance, particularly when moving beyond basic metric spaces.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students of calculus seeking to deepen their understanding through topology, as well as educators looking for textbook recommendations for introductory topology courses.

mcastillo356
Gold Member
Messages
660
Reaction score
364
My background is calculus, but I feel that, in calculus (my textbook is Calculus, by Robert Adams), I study limits, continuity, differentiation, integrals, etc, but, I realize that if we want cool things to happen in calculus, we need some basic topological concepts: I've taken a look at metric spaces, normed spaces, topological spaces, and I see no relationship with analisis.

I`d like some free online links that eventually should explain this relationship. The idea is to continue with my calculus textbook, and combine it with topology, which I lately find in most of calculus reasonings.

Attempt: Munkres, Simmons. I see no trace of connection between these two fields, ie, calculus and topology.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
continuity = topology. study the first topological result in calculus, the intermediate value theorem, and think about its proof.

there are some helpful comments in this wiki article, including links between IVT and topological "connectedness".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intermediate_value_theorem


one usefulness of topology is to make arguments easier for existence of solutions to problems when explicit solutions are hard to find. e.g. if f is a function and we want to find x such that f(x)=0, it may be very hard to find such an x. But by topology, if we can find an a with f(a)<0 and b with f(b)>0, AND if we can show f is defined and continuous on the interval [a,b], then an x with f(x) = 0 is guaranteed to exist somewhere in the interval (a,b) even if we cannot find it.

a generalization of this principle to higher dimensions can be used to show that if f is a continuous map from the unit disc to the plane, which maps each point of the boundary circle to itself, then again there is some point x in the open disc with f(x)=(0,0).

Similar generalizations exist for maps of n dimensional space, and no doubt also to infinite dimensional complete normed spaces, but I am not an expert on infinite dimensional analysis.

There is a topological argument that, in integral calculus, one cannot "rationalize" the integral of dx/sqrt(1-x^4). The analogous integrand dx/sqrt(1-x^2) can be rationalized by the substitution x = 2t/(1+t^2), but it can be shown that any such change of variables rationalizing the first integrand above would yield an orientation preserving continuous branched covering of the torus by a sphere, which is impossible by computing topological Euler characteristics. I.e. for such maps, Euler characteristics cannot go down, but the euler characteristic of the sphere is 2 and that of the torus is zero.

for an elementary example linking analytical and topological concepts, you might try proving that is f is a real valued function defined on the real line, with f(0) = 0, then:
1) the inverse image of every open interval containing 0, contains an open interval containing 0,
if and only if
2) every sequence converging to 0, maps under f to a sequence converging to 0.

I.e. show the calculus definition of continuity is equivalent to the topological space definition. This sort of thing is presumably in Simmons.
I think I got my own first sense of clarity from Simmons in reading a proof that every bounded increasing sequence of reals must have a limit, another abstract "existence proof", where we prove something of interest exists without actually finding it.

Another beautiful example is the contraction lemma or Banach fixed point theorem in metric spaces, that implies the existence of solutions of first order ordinary differential equations under certain hypotheses. The following link discusses this and other natural results in analysis such as the inverse function theorems in calculus that follow:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banach_fixed-point_theorem

after connectedness, the other most important topological concept for analysis is "compactness". a subset of the real line is compact iff it is closed and bounded, e.g. a closed finite interval [a,b] is compact. then every real valued function defined and continuous on a compact domain has a maximum (and minimum) value there. this is another existence result. then you use derivatives to try to actually find that maximum or minimum.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and mcastillo356
mathwonk said:
continuity = topology. study the first topological result in calculus, the intermediate value theorem, and think about its proof.

there are some helpful comments in this wiki article, including links between IVT and topological "connectedness".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intermediate_value_theorem
It is going to be hard work for me, but the link is very revealing.
mathwonk said:
I.e. show the calculus definition of continuity is equivalent to the topological space definition. This sort of thing is presumably in Simmons.
I think I got my own first sense of clarity from Simmons in reading a proof that every bounded increasing sequence of reals must have a limit, another abstract "existence proof", where we prove something of interest exists without actually finding it.
Simmons' "Introduction to topology and modern analysis" is the textbook I was looking for.
Thank you, @mathwonk
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mathwonk
Simmons is probably the easiest intro to Topology. It starts with metric spaces, then the second half of the book is an intro to functional analysis (think of this as calculus on infinite dimensional vector spaces).

The standard is Munkres, it’s a bit more difficult than Simmons, but still readable as far as books go.
The issue is it is a bit pricey for a copy, and quality of the hardcovers is crap. Ie., prone to fall apart.

If you want an alternative to Munkres, there is the book by Croom. I like Croom because it is shorter, and he has a very good second book on algebraic topology.

I recently purchased the book by pathasaraty:Topology. Since I have not really worked through it in length, I cannot vouch for it. But it appears to be very readable. I like it so far. It also does metric spaces first.

In short, if you want to see at a basic level of how topology and calculus connect. Start with a metric spaces approach first. If you want to learn about topology for topology sake. Then Munkres or Croom.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: mcastillo356
@mcastillo356 Try either:

Introduction to Metric and Topological Spaces by Wilson Alexander Sutherland​


Metric Spaces by Mícheál O'Searcoid

Topology of metric spaces by S. Kumaresan

or

Topology by Murray Eisenberg.

The first two, there are also instructor solution manual you can get it from your library or from the internet archive of other places on the interweb, The third one has Tom of worked out problems and many of the problems come with hints.

For the fourth, it literally only requires calculus from the reader to read it. It doesn't mean the problems/exercises are easy to do.

Why am I suggesting to you texts with solutions manual? Because there are problems where it would really be nice if the author shows you how the solutions are done. You will see what I mean when you work through a topology text that go beyond metric space topology.

If you want practice problems of the standard kind, look into Topology for Analysis by Albert Wilansky. There are no solutions to the problems. There is another problem book translated from Russian sources that does have both problems and solutions to them. But if you find the Wilanaky's book tough going, then this later one, you might as well forget about it.

By the way, learn your point set topology well, because majority of math uses it more than the topics within homotopy and anything that comes after relating to it.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: mcastillo356

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K