Introductory Statistical Mechanics - counting number of microstates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the number of microstates for a system of two harmonic oscillators with frequencies ω and 2ω, where the total energy is defined as U = q * ℏ * ω, with q being positive odd integers. The user initially calculates the number of microstates for various values of q and derives the function g(q) = CEILING(q/2). However, this conclusion is challenged by the lecturer, who points out that the correct energy expressions for the oscillators should include the zero-point energy terms, leading to a reevaluation of the microstate calculations. The lecturer emphasizes that the problem statement may have inaccuracies regarding the restriction of q to odd integers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of harmonic oscillators in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with the concept of microstates and statistical mechanics
  • Knowledge of energy quantization in quantum systems
  • Ability to manipulate mathematical expressions involving ceiling functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of quantum harmonic oscillators and their energy levels
  • Study the concept of microstates in statistical mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of zero-point energy in quantum systems
  • Explore the mathematical properties of ceiling functions and their applications in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying statistical mechanics and quantum mechanics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to harmonic oscillators and microstate calculations.

ausdreamer
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a system composed of 2 harmonic oscillators with frequencies w and 2w respectively (w = omega). The total energy of the system is U=q * h_bar * w, where q is a positive negative integer, ie. q = {1, 3, 5, ...}.

Write down the number of microstates of the system for each value of q.

Homework Equations



-

The Attempt at a Solution



The energy of the first harmonic oscillator with frequency w is: E_1 = j1 * h_bar * w.
The energy of the second harmonic oscillator with frequency 2w is: E_2 = 2 * j2 * h_bar * w.

So now the total energy of the system is given by U = (j1 + 2j2) * h_bar * w = q * h_bar * w.

Say q = 1. So there's only1 microstate for this energy level because 1) my lecturer said that j1, j2 are integers and can represent the number of particles the harmonic oscillator, and by writing out a table for values of j1 and 2j2 we just get:

| j1 | 2j2|
----------
| 1 | 0 |
----------

Now say q = 3. By writing out the table of possible microstates we get the table:

| j1 | 2j2|
----------
| 3 | 0 |
| 1 | 2 |
----------

So for q=3, there are 2 possible microstates of the system. Repeating this a few more times, I get a table which looks like this:

(let g = number of microstates for energy q)

| q | g |
--------
| 1 | 1 |
| 3 | 2 |
| 5 | 3 |
| 6 | 4 |
| 7 | 5 |
. .
. .
--------

And so writing g(q) (number of microstates as a function of energy q) I get:

g(q) = CIELING(q/2)

However, this is apparently wrong according to my lecturer. Can someone see where I went wrong in my reasoning? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see why q would be confined to odd values. Also, your expression for the energy of the oscillators is incorrect. They should be
\begin{align*}
E_1 &= \hbar\omega(n_1 + 1/2) \\
E_2 &= 2\hbar\omega(n_2 + 1/2)
\end{align*}
where ni=0, 1, ...
 
Well the problem stated q as positive odd integers, and also my lecturer said we can ignore the 1/2h_bar * w term since all we're interested in is the difference in energy not E itself.
 
Clearly if j1=0 and j2=1, you'd have q=2, which isn't odd. Either the problem is wrong or you're not accurately conveying the original problem statement.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
766