Topology Introductory Topology online textbook recommendations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion emphasizes the connection between calculus and topology, highlighting the importance of topological concepts such as continuity, compactness, and connectedness in understanding calculus principles. The Intermediate Value Theorem (IVT) is cited as a fundamental example linking these fields, demonstrating how topology can simplify existence proofs in calculus. The conversation also suggests various resources for learning topology, including textbooks by Simmons and Munkres, which are recommended for their clarity and comprehensiveness. Additionally, the discussion points out that understanding metric spaces is crucial for grasping the relationship between calculus and topology. The importance of continuity in both calculus and topology is underscored, with suggestions for proving the equivalence of definitions in both domains. Overall, the thread serves as a guide for those looking to deepen their understanding of how topology enriches calculus concepts.
mcastillo356
Gold Member
Messages
634
Reaction score
342
My background is calculus, but I feel that, in calculus (my textbook is Calculus, by Robert Adams), I study limits, continuity, differentiation, integrals, etc, but, I realize that if we want cool things to happen in calculus, we need some basic topological concepts: I've taken a look at metric spaces, normed spaces, topological spaces, and I see no relationship with analisis.

I`d like some free online links that eventually should explain this relationship. The idea is to continue with my calculus textbook, and combine it with topology, which I lately find in most of calculus reasonings.

Attempt: Munkres, Simmons. I see no trace of connection between these two fields, ie, calculus and topology.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
continuity = topology. study the first topological result in calculus, the intermediate value theorem, and think about its proof.

there are some helpful comments in this wiki article, including links between IVT and topological "connectedness".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intermediate_value_theorem


one usefulness of topology is to make arguments easier for existence of solutions to problems when explicit solutions are hard to find. e.g. if f is a function and we want to find x such that f(x)=0, it may be very hard to find such an x. But by topology, if we can find an a with f(a)<0 and b with f(b)>0, AND if we can show f is defined and continuous on the interval [a,b], then an x with f(x) = 0 is guaranteed to exist somewhere in the interval (a,b) even if we cannot find it.

a generalization of this principle to higher dimensions can be used to show that if f is a continuous map from the unit disc to the plane, which maps each point of the boundary circle to itself, then again there is some point x in the open disc with f(x)=(0,0).

Similar generalizations exist for maps of n dimensional space, and no doubt also to infinite dimensional complete normed spaces, but I am not an expert on infinite dimensional analysis.

There is a topological argument that, in integral calculus, one cannot "rationalize" the integral of dx/sqrt(1-x^4). The analogous integrand dx/sqrt(1-x^2) can be rationalized by the substitution x = 2t/(1+t^2), but it can be shown that any such change of variables rationalizing the first integrand above would yield an orientation preserving continuous branched covering of the torus by a sphere, which is impossible by computing topological Euler characteristics. I.e. for such maps, Euler characteristics cannot go down, but the euler characteristic of the sphere is 2 and that of the torus is zero.

for an elementary example linking analytical and topological concepts, you might try proving that is f is a real valued function defined on the real line, with f(0) = 0, then:
1) the inverse image of every open interval containing 0, contains an open interval containing 0,
if and only if
2) every sequence converging to 0, maps under f to a sequence converging to 0.

I.e. show the calculus definition of continuity is equivalent to the topological space definition. This sort of thing is presumably in Simmons.
I think I got my own first sense of clarity from Simmons in reading a proof that every bounded increasing sequence of reals must have a limit, another abstract "existence proof", where we prove something of interest exists without actually finding it.

Another beautiful example is the contraction lemma or Banach fixed point theorem in metric spaces, that implies the existence of solutions of first order ordinary differential equations under certain hypotheses. The following link discusses this and other natural results in analysis such as the inverse function theorems in calculus that follow:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banach_fixed-point_theorem

after connectedness, the other most important topological concept for analysis is "compactness". a subset of the real line is compact iff it is closed and bounded, e.g. a closed finite interval [a,b] is compact. then every real valued function defined and continuous on a compact domain has a maximum (and minimum) value there. this is another existence result. then you use derivatives to try to actually find that maximum or minimum.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes berkeman and mcastillo356
mathwonk said:
continuity = topology. study the first topological result in calculus, the intermediate value theorem, and think about its proof.

there are some helpful comments in this wiki article, including links between IVT and topological "connectedness".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intermediate_value_theorem
It is going to be hard work for me, but the link is very revealing.
mathwonk said:
I.e. show the calculus definition of continuity is equivalent to the topological space definition. This sort of thing is presumably in Simmons.
I think I got my own first sense of clarity from Simmons in reading a proof that every bounded increasing sequence of reals must have a limit, another abstract "existence proof", where we prove something of interest exists without actually finding it.
Simmons' "Introduction to topology and modern analysis" is the textbook I was looking for.
Thank you, @mathwonk
 
Simmons is probably the easiest intro to Topology. It starts with metric spaces, then the second half of the book is an intro to functional analysis (think of this as calculus on infinite dimensional vector spaces).

The standard is Munkres, it’s a bit more difficult than Simmons, but still readable as far as books go.
The issue is it is a bit pricey for a copy, and quality of the hardcovers is crap. Ie., prone to fall apart.

If you want an alternative to Munkres, there is the book by Croom. I like Croom because it is shorter, and he has a very good second book on algebraic topology.

I recently purchased the book by pathasaraty:Topology. Since I have not really worked through it in length, I cannot vouch for it. But it appears to be very readable. I like it so far. It also does metric spaces first.

In short, if you want to see at a basic level of how topology and calculus connect. Start with a metric spaces approach first. If you want to learn about topology for topology sake. Then Munkres or Croom.
 
  • Informative
Likes mcastillo356
@mcastillo356 Try either:

Introduction to Metric and Topological Spaces by Wilson Alexander Sutherland​


Metric Spaces by Mícheál O'Searcoid

Topology of metric spaces by S. Kumaresan

or

Topology by Murray Eisenberg.

The first two, there are also instructor solution manual you can get it from your library or from the internet archive of other places on the interweb, The third one has Tom of worked out problems and many of the problems come with hints.

For the fourth, it literally only requires calculus from the reader to read it. It doesn't mean the problems/exercises are easy to do.

Why am I suggesting to you texts with solutions manual? Because there are problems where it would really be nice if the author shows you how the solutions are done. You will see what I mean when you work through a topology text that go beyond metric space topology.

If you want practice problems of the standard kind, look into Topology for Analysis by Albert Wilansky. There are no solutions to the problems. There is another problem book translated from Russian sources that does have both problems and solutions to them. But if you find the Wilanaky's book tough going, then this later one, you might as well forget about it.

By the way, learn your point set topology well, because majority of math uses it more than the topics within homotopy and anything that comes after relating to it.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Likes mcastillo356
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
531
Replies
16
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
10K
Back
Top