Intuitive Definition of Electric Potential

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the intuitive definition of Electric Potential, also known as Voltage. The proposed definition equates Electric Potential to the change in electric potential energy between two points, contingent upon the presence of a test charge. Key points include the distinction between electric field intensity (a vector) and electric potential (a scalar), emphasizing that the electric field exists independently of a test charge. The conversation also touches on the relationship between electric potential energy and conservative forces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and their properties
  • Familiarity with electric potential energy concepts
  • Basic knowledge of scalar and vector quantities in physics
  • Awareness of conservative forces and the work-energy theorem
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical formulation of electric potential and its relation to electric fields
  • Explore the work-energy theorem in the context of conservative forces
  • Investigate the differences between scalar and vector quantities in physics
  • Learn about gravitational potential and its analogy to electric potential
USEFUL FOR

Undergraduate physics students, educators in physics, and anyone seeking a deeper understanding of electric potential and its applications in electromagnetism.

Skoth
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

For a few months, I've been (off and on) trying to come up with a more intuitive definition for Electric Potential (or Voltage, if you prefer), as all I can seem to find are mathematical equations. I believe I have finally come up with a satisfactory result, and I merely wanted to verify it with those that may be more knowledgeable on this matter than I.

Here's my intuitive definition:

"Analogous to the electric field, which is essentially the force vector that would occur were a test charge present in the field, the electric potential (being the integral of the electric potential energy divided by a test charge) is the change in electric potential energy between two points that would occur were a test charge present in the displacement from one point to the other."

This has, for me, significantly helped my intuitive understanding of it. Nevertheless, if someone finds fault with this definition in any way, please let me know, as I would hate to misinterpret the facts, especially as a undergraduate physics major! And, of course, as anyone who's taken at least a semester of physics knows, the devil's in the details.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Skoth! :smile:
Skoth said:
"Analogous to the electric field, which is essentially the force vector that would occur were a test charge present in the field, the electric potential (being the integral of the electric potential energy divided by a test charge) is the change in electric potential energy between two points that would occur were a test charge present in the displacement from one point to the other."

Yes, that looks ok (assuming the electric field is conservative).

Potential energy is defined as minus the work done by a conservative force, = change in energy (by the work-energy theorem :wink:).

And electric potential energy = potential energy per charge.

(an easier analogy would be to gravitational potential, which is gravitational potential energy per mass :wink:)
 
which is essentially the force vector that would occur were a test charge present in the field

It should be noted that there are two vectors associated with an electric field.

The electric field intensity, E which is considered alwys present, whether a test charge is introduced or not.
The direction of E is away from a positive charge and towards a negative one.

The electric force vector, F which is the field vector multiplied by the test charge.

The potential is a scalar quantity.
 
Studiot said:
It should be noted that there are two vectors associated with an electric field.

The electric field intensity, E which is considered alwys present, whether a test charge is introduced or not.
The direction of E is away from a positive charge and towards a negative one.

The electric force vector, F which is the field vector multiplied by the test charge.

The potential is a scalar quantity.

Yes, I figured that bit would be scrutinized, which is why I put "essentially" before it. I guess it's not the greatest analogy--especially since the one's a scalar and the other's a vector (which thankfully I am aware of). But besides that, I felt them to be analogous because they both go off a sort of if-then basis of 'if a test charge is present, then...' Of course, it's the 'then' part that defines the two differently from one another.
 
No you don't need a test charge for the electric field to be present.
 
Yes, I know, but if a test charge were present in an electric field, then the charge would be accelerated by the field vector. The same is also true of an electric potential difference: that is, that a test charge does not need to be present for one to exist.
 
Yes that's all correct.

Incidentally you said you didn't want to go mathematical, then mentioned integrals?

:approve:
 
Ha ha ha, good point! Well I guess all I can say to that is that the mind works in mysterious ways and mine is no different.

To quote one eminent philosopher of our generation:

"The inner machinations of my mind are an enigma."
--Patrick Star

patricks_enigma.jpg


And thanks for the verification, guys!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K