Invariance of scalar products on Lie algebras

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the conditions under which a scalar product on a Lie algebra \mathfrak{g} remains invariant under both the adjoint action ad and the adjoint action Ad of the corresponding group. It is established that if the group is connected, ad-invariance of the scalar product guarantees Ad-invariance. The Killing form serves as a specific example of such an invariant scalar product. The proof strategy involves analyzing the constancy of a function defined by the scalar product under the action of the group.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lie algebras and their properties
  • Familiarity with adjoint actions (ad and Ad)
  • Knowledge of invariant scalar products, specifically the Killing form
  • Basic concepts of differential calculus in the context of Lie groups
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Killing form in detail
  • Learn about the relationship between ad-invariance and Ad-invariance in Lie algebras
  • Explore the implications of connectedness in Lie groups
  • Investigate other examples of invariant scalar products in different Lie algebras
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, theoretical physicists, and students studying Lie algebras and their applications in various fields, particularly those interested in the properties of invariant scalar products and their implications in group theory.

SergejVictorov
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi folks,

If I have a Lie algebra \mathfrak{g} with an invariant (under the adjoint action ad of the Lie algebra) scalar product, what are the conditions that this scalar product is also invariant under the adjoint action Ad of the group? For instance, the Killing form is invariant under both actions. Is this also true in general?

My idea for the proof would be the following: If I know that the scalar product is invariant under Ad, then for any fixed vectors v,w in the Lie algebra, the function
f: G \rightarrow \mathbf{R}
\ g \mapsto \langle Ad(g)v, Ad(g)w \rangle
is constant, i.e.
f(g)=f(1)=k
By differentiating this function, I should be able to obtain the converse of the statement I need. I hope that this can be used to derive a condition for the invariance under Ad, given the invariance under ad.

I would be grateful for any hints since I'm stuck with this very crude ansatz.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the group is connected, then ad-invariance will automatically imply Ad-invariance. Basically, ad-invariance implies that this function f that you've defined is locally constant (since its differential will be 0). If G is connected, then locally constant implies constant.

Hope this helps!
 
rmehta said:
If the group is connected, then ad-invariance will automatically imply Ad-invariance. Basically, ad-invariance implies that this function f that you've defined is locally constant (since its differential will be 0). If G is connected, then locally constant implies constant.

Hope this helps!

Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K