Invariant mass plots for resonance 'particles'

  • I
  • Thread starter IAN 25
  • Start date
  • #1
49
4

Main Question or Discussion Point

The interaction p + π- → n + π- + π + may proceed by the creation of an intermediate 'particle' or resonance called a rho. This can be detected as a peak in the plot of invariant rest mass energy of the emergent pions versus frequency of pions observed. My question is quite simply, invariant rest mass is invariant. So, how can you have a spectrum of rest mass energies? The rest mass of the pi plus and pi minus are well known to be 139.6 Mev/ c2 for both, so how can you have a range of their rest mass energies?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
16,667
6,450
You are confusing the invariant mass of the system with the sum of the invariant masses. The invariant mass of the system is the square of the total 4-momentum, which is also the total energy in the CoM frame. This is not equal to the sum of the invariant masses of the pions.
 
  • #3
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
16,667
6,450
As a curiosity, a system of two photons have a non-zero invariant mass (unless they are collinear). The Higgs was discovered as a peak in the photon-photon invariant mass spectrum at 125 GeV.
 
  • #4
49
4
Thank you. Okay, I understand what the invariant mass of the system is - but if it is the sum of the invariant masses of the (two?) pions that is plotted, why is there a continuous range?
 
  • #5
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
16,667
6,450
Okay, I understand what the invariant mass of the system is
Based on the next part of your post, you don’t.

but if it is the sum of the invariant masses of the (two?) pions that is plotted, why is there a continuous range?
It is not the sum of the invariant masses of the pions. It is the invariant mass of the system of pions (in this case the system consists of three pions).
 
  • #6
49
4
To me invariant mass means invariant, whether its a sum for several particles or not; the masses have discrete values and

E2 -(pc)2 = m2c4 for each particle (or for a sum of particles)

which as I understand it, is a scalar invariant - which has the same value in all inertial frames, does it not?
So, how can you have a continuous range of energies on this plot, unless its (rest mass + kinetic ) energies. That I could understand. The Ek of the pions getting bigger until the threshold for the mass of the Rho is reached.
 
  • #7
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
16,667
6,450
Again. It is not the invariant masses of the particles added together. It is the invariant mass of the system, i.e., ##E^2 - p^2## for the system as a whole (in reasonable units where c=1).
 
  • #8
49
4
I still don't see why this gives a range of rest mass energies. That's the point I am trying to understand - the continuous range?
 
  • #9
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
16,667
6,450
Because:
$$
(E_1 + E_2)^2 - (\vec p_1 + \vec p_2)^2 = E_1^2 - \vec p_1^2 + E_2^2 - \vec p_2^2 + 2( E_1 E_2 - \vec p_1 \cdot \vec p_2)
= m_1^2 + m_2^2 + 2( E_1 E_2 - \vec p_1 \cdot \vec p_2) \neq (m_1 + m_2)^2.
$$
 
  • #10
34,045
9,895
If the pions are at rest relative to each other, the invariant mass of the system is simply the sum of their rest masses. If the pions move relative to each other, the invariant mass of the system (=the total energy in the center of mass frame) is higher.
 
  • #11
49
4
Got it! I can follow the algebra but the two worded sentences of physics (mfb) add clarity. Thank you both.
 
  • #12
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
16,667
6,450
Just to add some more food for thought.

You can always consider the rest frame of one of the pions where the expression from my previous post takes the form
$$
M^2 = m_1^2 + m_2^2 + 2 m_1\sqrt{m_2^2 + p_2^2} \geq (m_1+m_2)^2,
$$
with equality holding only when ##p_2 = 0##, i.e., when the pions are at relative rest.
 
  • #13
49
4
Yes that is an interesting example. In you original expression, it is clearly the term 2(E1 E2 - p1. p2 which provides the range of kinetic energies of the pions observed either side of the peak in the laboratory frame.
 
  • #14
49
4
As a curiosity, a system of two photons have a non-zero invariant mass (unless they are collinear). The Higgs was discovered as a peak in the photon-photon invariant mass spectrum at 125 GeV.
I did read an article featuring this in the UCL Physics department Annual Departmental Review in the year concerned.
 
  • #15
49
4
If the pions move relative to each other, the invariant mass of the system (=the total energy in the center of mass frame) is higher.
If they move relative to each other, I can see there will be more kinetic energy in the C.M. frame. However, the sum of their momenta will be zero in that frame. So, the expression (E1 + E2 )2 - (p1 + p2)2 will not change as a result will it? Since, the momentum term is zero. Or is the rest mass energy available in the laboratory frame bigger as a result? If so is it because of the 2(E1 E2 - p1 . p2) term, which appears in the invariant rest mass expression in the latter frame?

I am still a bit confused as to how you can have more energy in the C.M. frame if the momenta sum to zero in that frame.
 
  • #16
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
16,667
6,450
So, the expression (E1 + E2 )2 - (p1 + p2)2 will not change as a result will it?
Yes it will. You said it yourself, the ##E_i## increase because there is more kinetic energy.
 
  • #17
49
4
Of course, yes. Right , thanks.
 

Related Threads on Invariant mass plots for resonance 'particles'

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
641
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
726
Replies
9
Views
3K
Top