Inverse Fourier Transformation of a Fourier Transformation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the inverse Fourier transformation of a Fourier transformed function, focusing on the mathematical steps involved in deriving the original function from its Fourier transform. Participants explore the implications of the transformation, normalization factors, and the treatment of integration variables.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a series of equations leading to the conclusion that the inverse Fourier transform should yield the original function, expressing concern about the transition from step (6) to (7).
  • Another participant agrees with the overall correctness of the analysis and suggests that the function can be manipulated to show the delta function result, referencing the principle of stationary phase.
  • A third participant points out the omission of a normalization factor of 2π in the exponents, indicating that this is a critical aspect of the transformation.
  • A later reply elaborates on the normalization issue, providing an alternative expression for the inverse transform that includes the factor 1/2π and discusses the evaluation of the integral as a limit, leading to a Dirac delta function under certain conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the correctness of the mathematical approach but highlight different aspects, such as the normalization factor and the treatment of integration variables. There is no consensus on the implications of these factors, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to the inverse transformation.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the normalization factor and the assumptions regarding the treatment of the delta function. The discussion also reflects uncertainty about the implications of the principle of stationary phase and the conditions under which the Dirac delta function arises.

SwordSmith
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I am having problem with the inverse transformation of a Fourier transformed function which should give the function itself.

Let

f=f(x) and let f be Fourier transformable (whatever that implies)

Let

\tilde{f}(k)=∫^{\infty}_{-\infty}dx e^{-ikx}f(x) (1)

then we should have:

f(x)=∫^{\infty}_{-\infty}dk e^{ikx}f(k) (2)

This implies:

f(x)=∫^{\infty}_{-\infty}dk e^{ikx}∫^{\infty}_{-\infty}dx' e^{-ikx'}f(x') (3)

Note that x'≠x

My solution is as follows:
f(x)=∫^{\infty}_{-\infty}dk e^{ikx}∫^{\infty}_{-\infty}dx' e^{-ikx'}f(x') (4)

f(x)=∫^{\infty}_{-\infty}dk ∫^{\infty}_{-\infty}dx' e^{-ik(x'-x)}f(x') (5)

f(x)=∫^{\infty}_{-\infty}dx' ∫^{\infty}_{-\infty}dk e^{-ik(x'-x)}f(x') (6)

f(x)=∫^{\infty}_{-\infty}dx' δ(x'-x)f(x') (7)

f(x)=f(x) (8)

Is this correct? Step (6) to (7) bothers me. And what about the change in integration variables? I guess that is correct as well?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This looks correct to me. In step 6 you can move f(x') from the right integral into the left one, leaving int{ dk exp(-ik(x'-x)) }. This becomes the delta function in 7 as you state, through application of the principle of stationary phase.
 
The analysis is essentially correct, except that you need to include 2π in the exponents. That is 2πikx or -2πikx'.
 
Oh, right! Mathman points out that I left off the normalization--sorry! You can solve the problem using the variables he mentions, or you can continue to use k but then the inverse transform has a normalizing constant 1/2π in front like this:

f(x)=\frac{1}{2\pi}∫^{\infty}_{-\infty} e^{ikx}\tilde{f}(k)dk.
The key piece of eq. (6) becomes

\frac{1}{2\pi}∫^{\infty}_{-\infty} e^{ik(x'-x)}dk
which is evaluated most easily as a limit

\frac{1}{2\pi}\lim_{r\rightarrow\infty}∫^{r}_{-r} e^{ik(x'-x)}dk.
The integral becomes

\lim_{r\rightarrow\infty}r\frac{\sin r(x'-x)}{r(x'-x)}
which is single-valued only if x'=x. At that point the ratio equals one by L'Hospital's rule, the overall expression becomes infinite, and this expression is a Dirac delta function.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K