Inverse Function: Solve (-2x^5) + 1/3

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the inverse function of f(x) = (-2x^5) + 1/3. Participants are exploring the steps necessary to derive the inverse and questioning the correctness of various approaches and answers presented.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the process of finding the inverse function, including switching variables and solving for x in terms of y. Some express confusion over the steps and the correctness of the answers provided, while others question the validity of the original problem's solution.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various participants providing insights and cues towards the algebraic manipulation needed to find the inverse. There is a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the methods discussed, and some participants are still seeking clarity on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the steps to find the inverse, with some participants referencing specific methods and others questioning the assumptions made in the problem setup. The original poster's attempts at a solution appear to differ from what is suggested by others.

SETHOSCOTT
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the inverse function.
[Find (f^-1)(x)]
f(x) = (-2x^5) + 1/3

Homework Equations



Find the inverse function.
[Find (f^-1)(x)]
f(x)=2-2x^2

The Attempt at a Solution



(-2x^5) + 1/3
(-1/2x^1/5) + 3
Answer is different, how would I get to (-1/2x + 1/6)^1/5?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
uhh? :confused: if x → y is a function, then the inverse is y → x.

so if y = -2x5 + 1/3, what is x ?
 
Yea, not for this, just find functions.
 
Is the answer of the referred problem even correct?
 
If you have y = f(x) = -2x5 + 1/3, then the inverse is x = f-1(y).
From your equation y = -2x5 + 1/3, solve for x in terms of y. That will be your inverse, as a function of y. To write the inverse as a function of x, just switch the variables (i.e., change y to x).
 
SETHOSCOTT said:
Is the answer of the referred problem even correct?

Not even close. What you did is not how you find the inverse function. See tiny-tim's and my posts.
 
Inverse of x=y does not = y=x.
-y=-x is the inverse as it is perpendicular.
Go graph it.
 
It's the answer in the book, the reference has less than a 1/1,000 chance of being wrong.
 
SETHOSCOTT said:
how would I get to (-1/2x + 1/6)^1/5?
SETHOSCOTT said:
It's the answer in the book, the reference has less than a 1/1,000 chance of being wrong.

Like this :rolleyes:
tiny-tim said:
if y = -2x5 + 1/3, what is x ?
 
  • #10
I still want to know how, though.
 
  • #11
There is no reference to what x is.
 
  • #12
I am confused with all the confusion here.


@SETHOSCOTT
tiny-tim and Mark44 have given the perfect cues to the answer.

It's a simple algebraic manipulation of the equation. Interchange x and y and make y the subject of the equation to get the inverse function.

What's left to clear up?
 
  • #13
SETHOSCOTT said:
Inverse of x=y does not = y=x.
-y=-x is the inverse as it is perpendicular.
Go graph it.
The function y = x is its own inverse. Perpendicularity has nothing to do with inverses.

-y = -x is in fact equivalent to y = x. The graphs of these two equations are identical.
 
  • #14
I'm not going to even say anything... nevermind...
 
  • #15
PWND
y=-2x5 + (1/3)
- (1/3) - (1/3)
y - (1/3) = -2x5
* -.5 * -.5
(1/6) - (y/2)= x5
[(1/6) - (y/2)]1/5 = (x5)1/5
[(1/6) - (y/2)]1/5 = x
 
  • #16
Don't kid yourself... har-har.
 
  • #17
SETHOSCOTT said:
PWND
y=-2x5 + (1/3)
- (1/3) - (1/3)
y - (1/3) = -2x5
* -.5 * -.5
(1/6) - (y/2)= x5
[(1/6) - (y/2)]1/5 = (x5)1/5
[(1/6) - (y/2)]1/5 = x

That's better! :smile:

But you don't need all those intermediate steps (some of which I don't really understand) …

it's ok if you just say

y = -2x5 + (1/3),

so 2x5 = (1/3) - y

so x = (1/6 - y/2)1/5 :wink:

(and so the inverse is f-1(x) = … ? :smile:)
 
  • #18
Wait so you KNEW this?
 
  • #19
Well, duh, switch, ummm... x and y, but, yea.
 
Last edited:
  • #20
"Epiphany"

SETHOSCOTT said:
Well, duh, switch, ummm... x and y, but, yea.

"duh" is irrelevant …

if you want full marks in the exam,

you do actually need to finish the question! :wink:
 
  • #21
I did, I put, "f-1(x)= [(1/6) - (x/2)]1/5," for my answer. TY, anyways. Off to chemistry, for metallurgy.
 
  • #22
Wait, you guys said all I needed to do was switch the variables, which is false.
 
  • #23
SETHOSCOTT said:
I did, I put, "f-1(x)= [(1/6) - (x/2)]1/5," for my answer.

:confused: where?
SETHOSCOTT said:
Wait, you guys said all I needed to do was switch the variables, which is false.

No, it's true … switch x and y (or x and f(x)) in the original equation, and then solve for x :smile:
 
  • #24
R1. On my assignment. I put it on my assignment.

R2. Yea, see, you didn't say anything about solving, it worked either way.
 
  • #25
SETHOSCOTT said:
R1. On my assignment. I put it on my assignment.

ah, you mean …
SETHOSCOTT said:

The Attempt at a Solution



(-2x^5) + 1/3
(-1/2x^1/5) + 3
Answer is different, how would I get to (-1/2x + 1/6)^1/5?
… we thought that was the answer in the book. :wink:
 
  • #26
I guess. I think... yea, that way. a few exceptions, like utilizing the rooting overhang, instead of the powering to the 1/5, but it is equal to the answer, exactly equal.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K