Inverse Laplace Transform of Y(s) = 1/[(s-2)^2(s+1)^3]

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ithryndil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Laplace
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the inverse Laplace transform of the function Y(s) = 1/[(s-2)²(s+1)³]. The user initially attempted to apply partial fraction decomposition, resulting in incorrect coefficients A, B, C, D, and E. After identifying a mistake in their matrix calculations, the user corrected the coefficients to A = -1/27, B = 1/27, C = 1/27, D = 2/27, and E = 1/9. This correction led to a more accurate setup for proceeding with the inverse transform.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace transforms
  • Knowledge of partial fraction decomposition
  • Familiarity with solving systems of linear equations
  • Proficiency in using matrix operations for calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to perform inverse Laplace transforms using the corrected coefficients
  • Study the application of partial fraction decomposition in control systems
  • Explore matrix methods for solving linear equations in engineering contexts
  • Investigate common mistakes in Laplace transform calculations and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, particularly those studying control systems or differential equations, will benefit from this discussion. It is also valuable for anyone looking to improve their skills in Laplace transforms and algebraic manipulation.

Ithryndil
Messages
142
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Y(s) = \frac{1}{(s-2)^{2}(s+1)^{3}}


Homework Equations


...


The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, so my goal is to find the Laplace transform of the above. I need to use partial fraction decomposition to break up the denominator. With that in mind, I have the following:


Y(s) = \frac{1}{(s-2)^{2}(s+1)^{3}} = \frac{A}{s-2}+ \frac{B}{(s-2)^{2}} + \frac{C}{s+1} + \frac{D}{(s+1)^{2}}+ \frac{E}{(s+1)^{3}}

After this I multiplied by the common denominator and came up with 5 equations. Those equations I came up with are:

A + C = 0
A + B - 2C + D = 0
-3A + 3B - 3C -3D + E = 0
-5A + 3B + 4C -4E = 0
-2A + B + 4C + 4D + 4E = 1

Now, once solving those I get:

A = 4/27
B = 8/27
C = -4/27
D = 7/27
E = 3/27

However, that's wrong, I am wondering if my setup is correct. I can post all my algebraic work if necessary.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ithryndil said:

Homework Statement


Y(s) = \frac{1}{(s-2)^{2}(s+1)^{3}}


Homework Equations


...


The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, so my goal is to find the Laplace transform of the above. I need to use partial fraction decomposition to break up the denominator. With that in mind, I have the following:


Y(s) = \frac{1}{(s-2)^{2}(s+1)^{3}} = \frac{A}{s-2}+ \frac{B}{(s-2)^{2}} + \frac{C}{s+1} + \frac{D}{(s+1)^{2}}+ \frac{E}{(s+1)^{3}}

After this I multiplied by the common denominator and came up with 5 equations. Those equations I came up with are:

A + C = 0
A + B - 2C + D = 0
-3A + 3B - 3C -3D + E = 0
-5A + 3B + 4C -4E = 0
-2A + B + 4C + 4D + 4E = 1

so far so good:smile:...

Now, once solving those I get:

A = 4/27
B = 8/27
C = -4/27
D = 7/27
E = 3/27

However, that's wrong, I am wondering if my setup is correct. I can post all my algebraic work if necessary.

This can't be right; using these values, A+B-2C+D==27/27=1\neq0 which clearly contradicts your second equation...
 
This post...unnecessary.
 
Hmm...well, let me double check my matrix in my calculator. Thanks for pointing that out to me.

I found my problem, I had swapped a 1 with a 0 in my matrix on my calculator. My new values are:

A = -1/27
B = 1/27
C = 1/27
D = 2/27
E = 1/9

Thank you, after looking at my work for awhile, and double checking the work tends to blur together. I needed an extra pair of eyes. Thanks again!
 
Last edited:
Ithryndil said:
Hmm...well, let me double check my matrix in my calculator. Thanks for pointing that out to me.

I found my problem, I had swapped a 1 with a 0 in my matrix on my calculator. My new values are:

A = -1/27
B = 1/27
C = 1/27
D = 2/27
E = 1/9

That's better :smile:
 
Yeah, I have yet to do the inverse transform, but those values are definitely better and look like they will work.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K