Inverse matrices with scalar multiplication.

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 12K views
brydustin
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
I was surprised that I have never had to do this in so long and forgot the basic way to factor out a scalar multiple when a matrix is raised to a certain power (for example -1 for inverse matrices).

Basically, I just want some confirmation:

(λT)^n= λ^n (T^n ) ∶ for λ ϵ F and Tϵ L(V).
For example:
(λT)^(-1)=(1/λ) T^(-1)
or…. (λI-T)^(-1)=(1/λ) (I-T/λ)^(-1)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
we have tex, sup and sub tags. Request to use them.
 
brydustin said:
Basically, I just want some confirmation:

(λT)^n= λ^n (T^n ) ∶ for λ ϵ F and Tϵ L(V).
Remember that matrix multiplication is just composition of linear maps.

For all x we have

[tex]((\lambda T)\circ (\lambda T))(x)=(\lambda T)(\lambda (Tx))=\lambda(\lambda T(Tx))=\lambda^2(T\circ T(x))=(\lambda^2 T^2) x[/tex]

using linearity. So it holds for n=2. By induction it holds for all n.
 
Landau said:
Remember that matrix multiplication is just composition of linear maps.

For all x we have

[tex]((\lambda T)\circ (\lambda T))(x)=(\lambda T)(\lambda (Tx))=\lambda(\lambda T(Tx))=\lambda^2(T\circ T(x))=(\lambda^2 T^2) x[/tex]

using linearity. So it holds for n=2. By induction it holds for all n.

great! I thank this wraps up this thread then... I assume then that it holds for strictly negative values of n as well...
 
Yes, if T is invertible and lambda =/0 then

[tex](\lambda^{-1}T^{-1}\circ \lambda T)(x)=(\lambda^{-1}T^{-1})(\lambda Tx)=T^{-1}Tx=x[/tex]

hence

[tex](\lambda T)^{-1}=\lambda^{-1}T^{-1}.[/tex]