Investigating Weight Distribution & Acceleration in Toy Cars

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the impact of weight distribution on the acceleration of battery-powered toy cars, specifically comparing two models: Car F with weight at the front and Car B with weight at the back. The findings indicate that Car B accelerates faster due to reduced weight transfer time, enhancing traction at the rear wheels. The conversation also highlights that while downforce is less significant at lower speeds, weight distribution plays a crucial role in initial acceleration, mirroring principles observed in real-world automotive dynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics principles related to acceleration and weight distribution
  • Familiarity with the mechanics of four-wheel drive systems
  • Knowledge of traction and its effects on vehicle performance
  • Experience with conducting scientific experiments and data analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of weight transfer in automotive dynamics
  • Explore the principles of traction and downforce in vehicle performance
  • Investigate the mechanics of four-wheel drive systems and torque distribution
  • Conduct experiments on weight distribution using different toy car models
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, hobbyists experimenting with toy car mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of acceleration and weight distribution in vehicles.

carcar2
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am doing a science experiment dealing with car physics.

The experiment I am doing involves battery-powered toy cars approximately the size of a hand (four-wheel drive). I am not sure
what effect the weight distribution has on the acceleration of the car. To be more specific, I am looking for the effect of weight/downforce applied to either the front or the back on weight
transfer/traction.

I am attaching weight to the front for one kind of a car(Car F) and the back for another(Car B) and testing the time of the two in a straight-line race. According to my data, the car with the weight attached to the back(Car B) is faster. The only explanation I can come up is that the time which it takes for the weight transfer to take place for the car with weight attached to the back(Car B) is less than the other car(Car F), which makes Car B to accelerate faster. Would you explain why the difference took place?

Also, I am not sure if the traction caused by downforce in the front or the back has any different effect on the speed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi carcar, welcome to the forums.

Is it possible that the cars aren't perfect four wheel drive? Maybe more torque is going to the rear wheels. That would explain the difference.
 
As a car nut (a real one, not toys :p), I could have told you, that all things being equal, the car with the weight on the back will accelerate faster.

Rear engined dragsters are the top runners for a reason :)

Weight transfer, as well as traction come into play. Assuming you are getting consistent answers, I would say that your experiment went as planned.
Traction doesn't come into play as "downforce" because frankly these cars aren't moving fast enough. This does matter in the 'launch' (the initial take off), as the weight on the rear will be greater due to transfer, and thus the more weight on the rear means more traction on the tires that will be contacting the most. This is how it works in the real world, but I do believe that wheel spin on your toy car, even if it weren't 4x4, would be negligible, but who knows :p


Swap weights on the cars, and see if you get the same results.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K