Iodine Clock Kinetics: Which Mechanism is Supported?

cvc121
Messages
61
Reaction score
1
1. Homework Statement
An iodine clock kinetics experiment was performed by varying the composition of reactant solutions and measuring resulting rates of reaction (based on the data given, I have determined the rate law to be R = [I-]1[S2O82-]1). Which of these four proposed mechanisms below would be supported by these results?

Mechanism 1: I-(aq) + I-(aq) ---> I22-(aq) (slow)
I22-(aq) + S2O82-(aq) ---> I2(aq) + SO42-(aq) (fast)

Mechanism 2: I-(aq) + S2O82-(aq) ---> [S2O82-·I]3-(aq) (slow)
[S2O82-·I]3-(aq) + I-(aq) ---> I2(aq) + 2 SO42-(aq) (fast)

Mechanism 3: I-(aq) + S2O82-(aq) <---> [S2O82-·I]3-(aq) (fast)
[S2O82-·I]3-(aq) + I-(aq) ---> I2(aq) + 2 SO42-(aq) (fast)

Mechanism 4: 2I-(aq) + S2O82-(aq) ---> I2(aq) + 2SO42-(aq)

2. Homework Equations
Rate law: R = k[A]xy

3. The Attempt at a Solution
Mechanism 1: R = [I-]2. Therefore, this is incorrect.

Mechanism 2: R = [I-][S2O82-] Therefore, this is correct.

Mechanism 3: R = [[S2O82-·I]3-][I-]. Therefore, this is incorrect.

Mechanism 4: R = [I-]2[S2O82-]. Therefore, this is incorrect.

Answer: Mechanism 2

Can anyone confirm if I am on the right track? Thanks. All help is very much appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Pardon me for the incorrect rate law equation that I listed.
 
Yes I'd say you are on the right track. I agree mechanism (2) is consistent with the kinetics.

However have another look at mechanism 3, which after all is only quantitavely different from 2. You have to work out the rate expression as a function of your experimental variables (which your other three are) not of intermediates. You may find the answer is more nuanced. :oldwink:
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
23K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K