I IRAF 2025?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mishima
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
By 2025, IRAF's prevalence in astronomy appears to be declining, with many in academia and research shifting towards alternatives like Astropy and Pyraf. While IRAF was dominant in the early 2000s and still relevant in the 2010s, its usage for real-world telescope installations may be waning. Observational Astronomy courses may not prioritize IRAF anymore, reflecting a broader trend towards modern software tools for image reduction. The discussion highlights uncertainty about current teaching practices and the tools being used in educational settings. Overall, there seems to be a significant transition away from IRAF in favor of newer technologies.
mishima
Messages
576
Reaction score
43
TL;DR
Wondering what the current trend in Academia and research is regarding IRAF
Hi, I was wondering how prevalent/popular IRAF is in 2025. When I studied in 2001 it was dominant. Last I really played with image reduction in the 2010s it was still fairly important. I am guessing most service observers still use it for real-world telescope installations.

Or is Astropy or Pyraf becoming more common? Or something else? If I took an Observational Astronomy course today, would I still have a high chance of IRAF being taught?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
mishima said:
TL;DR Summary: Wondering what the current trend in Academia and research is regarding IRAF
For the non-cognoscenti (like me!):
IRAF (Image Reduction and Analysis Facility) is a collection of software written at the National Optical Astronomy Observatory (NOAO) geared towards the reduction of astronomical images and spectra in pixel array form.
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IRAF)
 
Reply
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke and berkeman
Could it be that indeed mostly everyone has moved on from IRAF in 2025?

Is anyone teaching an Observational Astronomy course with data reduction techniques? Curious what is used these days in place of IRAF.
 
Not sure. This question may be too specific for our member base to be honest. We don't have a huge number of professors and such.
 

Thread 'Population 3 star (Pop III) candidate LAP1'

"Pop III stars are thought to be composed entirely of helium and hydrogen with trace amounts of lithium, the ingredients left over after the Big Bang. They formed early on, around 200 million years after the universe began. These stars are extremely rare because they died out long ago, although scientists have hoped that the faint light from these distant, ancient objects would be detectable. Previous Population III candidates have been ruled out because they didn't meet the three main...
View full post »

Similar threads

I NGC7741 Imaging: Should I Stack Images Through IRAF?
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
A N-Body Simulations of Chaos in the Orbits of Trappist System Planets
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
B Gravitational Wave Interference Graphical Computer Simulation
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Where can I find publicly accessible data from observatories in Europe?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
B New Paradox Discovered, I Think
  • · Replies 98 ·
4
Replies
98
Views
7K
Admissions Chances of Getting into MIT as an International Student from India
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
9K
Stargazing How can I safely view a solar eclipse?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
I Hidden phase in polarization tests of Bell's inequality?
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
I ATLAS and CMS see signs of Higgs->muons decay
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
State of Pulsar Theory & Observations
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
8K