Irreducibility over Integers mod P

  • Thread starter Thread starter apalmer3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integers
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the irreducibility of polynomials over the field of integers mod 11. It is established that both polynomials, x^2 + 1 and x^2 + x + 4, are irreducible over F, as they do not have any zeros in the field. Additionally, the participants confirm that the quotient rings F[x]/(x^2 + 1) and F[x]/(x^2 + x + 4) are isomorphic, given that both fields contain 121 elements. The conversation highlights the misconception that the absence of real roots implies irreducibility in modular arithmetic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial irreducibility in finite fields
  • Familiarity with modular arithmetic, specifically integers mod 11
  • Knowledge of quadratic residues and their applications
  • Basic concepts of field theory and isomorphism
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of irreducible polynomials over finite fields
  • Learn about quadratic residues and their role in determining irreducibility
  • Explore the concept of isomorphism in field theory, particularly for finite fields
  • Investigate Galois theory and its applications to polynomial equations
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students and researchers in abstract algebra, particularly those studying finite fields, polynomial irreducibility, and field isomorphisms. It is also relevant for mathematicians interested in modular arithmetic and its implications in algebraic structures.

apalmer3
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a. Prove that x^2+1 is irreducible over the field F of integers mod 11.
b. Prove that x^2+x+4 is irreducible over the field F of integers mod 11.
c. Prove that F[x]/(x^2+1) and F[x]/(x^2+x+4) are isomorphic.


Homework Equations


A polynomial p(x) in F[x] is said to be irreducible over F if whenever p(x)=a(x)b(x) with
a(x),b(x)\in F[x], then one of a(x) or b(x) has degree 0 (i.e. constant).

I was also told by somebody it's sufficient to show that there aren't any zeros...


The Attempt at a Solution


a. The zeros of x^2+1 are + and - i. Therefore, it is irreducible over F.
b. The zeros of x^2+x+4 are also imaginary (-.5 + or - 1.93649167 i), and it is therefore irreducible over F.
c. Each field has 121 elements, so they're isomorphic?

Thanks in advance for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
x^2+1 is reducible mod 5. It's equal to (x+2)(x+3). How can that be when it's roots are imaginary??
 
I don't know. I don't know how to prove that they're irreducible, really. I'm just following what somebody said about it being sufficient to show that it has no zeros...
 
Apparently, the fact that a polynomial doesn't have real roots doesn't imply that it's irreducible mod n. You agree with that, right? So throw that out. How do you think I found that x=2 and x=3 solve x^2+1 mod 5? Just think about it before I tell you.
 
Well... 2+3 = 5. So it's a partition of 5...?
 
5+6 is a partition of 11. But (x+5)(x+6) doesn't work. Ok, I'll tell you. I guessed. x^2+1=0 mod 5 is the same as x^2=4 mod 5. 2 clearly works, so -2=3 mod 5 also works. For mod 11, you need to solve x^2=10 mod 11. You can prove it has no solution mod 11 by just trying all of the numbers {0,1,2,...10} for x. There may be a more systematic way to do this by using quadratic residues or something, but I'm not an expert in that. I just wanted to let you know that the real root argument was going nowhere.
 
Okay. I think I understand that now.

(i.e. x^3-9 is irreducible over integers mod 31 cause no x makes x^3=9mod31 true. But It is reducible over integers mod 11... (x-4)(x^2+4x+5).)

But how do I prove part c? (Sorry I'm asking so many questions. I appreciate the help!)
 
I'm the one who is sorry, like I said, this is a bit out of my field and I'd have to study up on it. In short, I don't know. Reply to this so it appears at the top of this list without my name as the last person to reply and maybe someone who know Galois type stuff can help you.
 
Okay. Thanks Dick. Your help is very much appreciated.

To everyone else... help with part c?
 
  • #10
Finite fields of the same order are isomorphic. Equivalently, for all primes p and all positive integers n, there is a unique field up to isomorphism of order p^n.

The proof of this is beyond me to explain. Maybe the question can be answered without relying on this knowledge, by using irreducibility or extension fields.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K