Irreducible reps of maximal tori

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jdstokes
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the representations of the circle group S^1 = \mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z} to the unitary group U(1), specifically the representation defined by \(\rho_n : [x] \mapsto e^{2\pi i n x}\). The push-forward of this representation, denoted as \((\rho_n)_\ast\), maps the tangent space of S^1 to that of U(1) and is expressed as \(\lambda \frac{\partial }{\partial x} \mapsto n\lambda \frac{\partial }{\partial x}\). The relationship is established through the derivative of the complex analytic functions \(e^{2\pi x(t)}\) and \((e^{2\pi x(t)})^n\), demonstrating that the push-forward effectively scales the tangent vector by the integer \(n\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of circle group representations, specifically S^1 and U(1).
  • Familiarity with push-forward maps in differential geometry.
  • Knowledge of complex analysis, particularly derivatives of complex functions.
  • Basic concepts of tangent spaces in manifold theory.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of circle group representations in more depth.
  • Explore the concept of push-forward maps in differential geometry.
  • Learn about complex analytic functions and their derivatives.
  • Investigate the relationship between tangent spaces and their mappings in manifold theory.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying representation theory, differential geometry, and complex analysis who seek to deepen their understanding of the relationships between different mathematical structures.

jdstokes
Messages
520
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

The representations [itex]S^1 = \mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z} \to U(1)[/itex] are of the form [itex]\rho_n : [x] \mapsto e^{2\pi i n x}[/itex] for any integer n. I'm trying to understand why the push-forward [itex](\rho_n)_\ast : x \mapsto nx[/itex].

The push-forward of [itex]\rho_n[/itex] is a map from the tangent space of S^1 to the tangent space of U(1).

ie it is the map [itex](\rho_n)_\ast : \lambda \frac{\partial }{\partial x} (\cdot) \mapsto \lambda\partial (\cdot \circ \rho_n)[/itex]

where the dot indicates a the argument function and lambda is any real number.

Presumably one should have [itex]\lambda\partial/\partial x \mapsto n\lambda \partial/\partial x[/itex] or something but I can't see how this follows from the above.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is actually really easy if you consider the derivative of [itex]e^{2pi x(t)}[/itex] and [itex](e^{2pi x(t)})^n[/itex] with respect to t. Since both maps are complex analytic you will find that the derivative of the latter is n times the derivative of the first function, multiplied by some phase difference. From the point of view of the tangent spaces, this means that [itex]x \mapsto nx[/itex] as required.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K