Irregular free-free beam, non-numerical solutions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on non-numerical methods for analyzing the deflection of irregular free-free beams, particularly those with variable second moments of area and distributed lumped masses. Participants explore the potential of using macroscopic characteristics, such as the center of mass and center of oscillation, to simplify analysis without detailed partitioning. It is emphasized that while simpler methods may exist, engineering solutions must prioritize safety and accuracy over convenience. The consensus is that relying on precise measurements is essential for effective beam analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Euler-Bernoulli beam theory
  • Familiarity with finite element methods (FEM)
  • Knowledge of beam mechanics and deflection analysis
  • Concepts of center of mass and center of oscillation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research non-numerical methods for beam deflection analysis
  • Explore advanced finite element analysis techniques
  • Study the implications of variable second moments of area in beam design
  • Investigate safety protocols in engineering design practices
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, structural analysts, and students in mechanical or civil engineering who are involved in beam analysis and design, particularly those interested in simplifying complex calculations while ensuring safety and accuracy.

Teslosifone
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
What are the simplest, even if not very accurate, non-numerical ways (for example a variation of Euler-Bernoulli) for describing the deflection relative to a given load of a free-free beam with irregular shape (variable second moment of area and/or lumped masses distributed at some points)? In finite element methods there would be the need of knowing exactly the second moment of area and weight of such lumped masses at given positions in the long axis of the beam. Isn't there an otherwise method that uses more macroscopic characteristics of the whole beam like center of mass, center of oscillation relative to center of mass or something like that, in order to reduce the partitioning of the beam?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
Teslosifone said:
Isn't there an otherwise method that uses more macroscopic characteristics of the whole beam like center of mass, center of oscillation relative to center of mass or something like that, in order to reduce the partitioning of the beam?
There is no quick and simple solution to complex problems. Engineering involves designing safe solutions based on measurements, not on guesses. If you think you have found a shortcut that works, then clearly label and file your notes as your insurance company may be needing them after the coroners court.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
61K
Replies
16
Views
12K
Replies
4
Views
4K