Is 2 pi i equal to 0, contradicting the fact that pi and i cannot equal 0?

  • Level: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nicktacik
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
5 replies · 4K views
nicktacik
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
This one has me stumped.

[tex]e^{\pi i} = -1[/tex]
[tex]e^{2 \pi i} = (-1) ^ 2 = 1[/tex]
[tex]ln(e^{2 \pi i}) = ln(1) = 0[/tex]
[tex]2 \pi i = 0[/tex]

Or is 2 pi i actually 0, and this does not actually imply that either pi = 0 or i = 0?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Since [itex]2 \pi i[/itex] is an imaginary number you must use the definition of LN in the complex plane. You are using the definition for the real number line.

in the complex plane we have:

[tex]logz = log(r) + i \theta[/tex]

edit (changed my definition of z)
[tex]r = |z|[/tex]
and
[tex]\theta = arg(z)[/tex]
 
Last edited:
More than that - logs of complex numbers are only defined up to multiples of 2pi. One can ought to take the principal branch - this is just a slightly more complicated variation on the square root 'fallacies'.
 
The mistake is here:
[tex]\ln e^z = z[/tex]
This is not true for complex numbers.

Note: the other way around:
[tex]\exp (\ln z) = z, \ z\not =0[/tex]
Is true.
 
Ok thanks. As you can see, I haven't taken my complex variables class yet.
 
its sort of like saying, (2^2 =4 and (-2)^2 = 4 so 2 = -2.)