Is 2 pi i equal to 0, contradicting the fact that pi and i cannot equal 0?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nicktacik
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical expression involving complex numbers, specifically whether the equation 2πi can be considered equal to 0. Participants explore the implications of this equality in the context of complex logarithms and the properties of exponential functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the equation e^{2πi} = 1 and concludes that ln(e^{2πi}) = 0, leading to the assertion that 2πi = 0.
  • Another participant argues that the logarithm must be defined in the complex plane, suggesting that the initial approach used the real number line definition incorrectly.
  • A third participant notes that logarithms of complex numbers are defined up to multiples of 2π, indicating a potential oversight in the reasoning presented.
  • One participant points out a common mistake regarding the relationship between the exponential and logarithmic functions in the context of complex numbers, emphasizing that ln(e^z) does not hold true as it does for real numbers.
  • A later reply acknowledges a lack of familiarity with complex variables, suggesting that the discussion may involve advanced concepts not yet fully understood by all participants.
  • Another participant draws an analogy to the square root function, highlighting the complexities involved in interpreting equalities in the context of complex numbers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of the initial conclusion that 2πi = 0, with some challenging the reasoning and others providing clarifications about the properties of logarithms in the complex plane. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the definitions of logarithms in the complex plane and the potential misunderstanding of the properties of complex exponentials and logarithms. There are unresolved mathematical steps regarding the implications of the equality presented.

nicktacik
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
This one has me stumped.

[tex]e^{\pi i} = -1[/tex]
[tex]e^{2 \pi i} = (-1) ^ 2 = 1[/tex]
[tex]ln(e^{2 \pi i}) = ln(1) = 0[/tex]
[tex]2 \pi i = 0[/tex]

Or is 2 pi i actually 0, and this does not actually imply that either pi = 0 or i = 0?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Since [itex]2 \pi i[/itex] is an imaginary number you must use the definition of LN in the complex plane. You are using the definition for the real number line.

in the complex plane we have:

[tex]logz = log(r) + i \theta[/tex]

edit (changed my definition of z)
[tex]r = |z|[/tex]
and
[tex]\theta = arg(z)[/tex]
 
Last edited:
More than that - logs of complex numbers are only defined up to multiples of 2pi. One can ought to take the principal branch - this is just a slightly more complicated variation on the square root 'fallacies'.
 
The mistake is here:
[tex]\ln e^z = z[/tex]
This is not true for complex numbers.

Note: the other way around:
[tex]\exp (\ln z) = z, \ z\not =0[/tex]
Is true.
 
Ok thanks. As you can see, I haven't taken my complex variables class yet.
 
its sort of like saying, (2^2 =4 and (-2)^2 = 4 so 2 = -2.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K