Is 3/3 the same as 1 or not? The Confusion Between Decimal Notation and Numbers

  • Thread starter Thread starter dracobook
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies that 0.9999... is mathematically equivalent to 1, a conclusion supported by the properties of decimal notation in the number system. Participants emphasize that fractions like 1/2 and 3/6 illustrate how different representations can denote the same value. The consensus is that misunderstanding arises from conflating symbolic notation with numerical value, which is crucial for maintaining arithmetic consistency. This topic has been previously addressed in mathematical literature, confirming the equivalence of 0.9999... and 1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of decimal notation and its properties
  • Basic knowledge of fractions and their equivalences
  • Familiarity with mathematical concepts of limits and infinite series
  • Awareness of the implications of symbolic representation in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of limits in calculus to understand infinite series
  • Explore the properties of real numbers and their representations
  • Study the implications of decimal expansions in number theory
  • Investigate historical perspectives on number representation and notation
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students in mathematics, and anyone interested in the foundations of number theory and decimal representation.

dracobook
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
My friend thought of this some time ago...
1/3 is equal to .333333...
2/3 is equal to 2*(1/3) or .66666...
3/3 is equal to 3*(1/3). If 1/3 is equal to .333... then wouldn't 3/3 be equal to .9999...? Also, isn't .9999... not the same as 1?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You should search this. Analogues of this question have come up before.
 
Also, isn't .9999... not the same as 1?

Double negatives! I don't think you're asking quite what you meant to ask. :biggrin:

0.999~ is the same number as 1. That the same number can have different symbolic representations shouldn't be surprising... after all, you know that the fractions 1/2 and 3/6 are the same number!

Examples like the one you posted are demonstrations of why mathematicians decided to require that 0.999~ = 1 in the decimal number system: otherwise arithmetic would not work nicely.
 
Hurkyl said:
Double negatives! I don't think you're asking quite what you meant to ask.

Actually, Hurkyl, reading the whole post I think this time the double negative was exactly what he meant. Many people who confuse the "decimal notation" for numbers with the numbers themselves think that 0.9999... is not 1. Here I think the OP was saying: "Isn't it the case that 0.9999... is not the same as 1" and the double negative is perfectly correct.
 

Similar threads

High School Difference between powers of numbers equaling 1
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
High School Squaring finite decimals of 2/3 and 1/3 - growing patterns
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Undergrad Geometry problem of interest with a 3-4-5 triangle
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
58K
Undergrad Calculating the odds of drawing 3 "no" notes from a hat with 3 "no" and 3 "yes" notes
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
MHB If S=9999 prove we can find at least 3 students having the same score
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
High School Combinatorics and Magic squares
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Undergrad On base-b expansion of nonnegative reals
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Undergrad Decimal Precision - Multiplying, Rounding, and Adding
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
High School Error in approximation to log(223)/log(3) .... senior moment?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
High School Fractional/decimal powers
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K