Is 495.5 Equal to 495? A Mathematical Proof

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter zeromodz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 3K views
zeromodz
Messages
244
Reaction score
0
Sorry, I typed the wrong thing in the title, I meant 495.5 = 495

(1/3) + (1/3) + (1/3) = 1
(0.333333333333) + (0.33333333333) + (0.33333333333) = 1
0.999999999999999 = 1
99.9999999 = 100 (Multiplied by 10)
99.1 = 99 (Subtracted 0.9)
495.5= 495 (Multiplied by 5) <---------------PROOF
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Operations on infinite decimal representations need to be considered more carefully.
 
99.9999999 = 100 (Multiplied by 10)
99.1 = 99 (Subtracted 0.9)

This is not how subtraction is done

100-.9=99?

99.9999999... -.9=99.1?

Both wrong. Even if we assume that you flipped the equation so 100-.9=99.1, 99.99999-.9 is not 99
 
Office_Shredder said:
This is not how subtraction is done

100-.9=99?

99.9999999... -.9=99.1?

Both wrong. Even if we assume that you flipped the equation so 100-.9=99.1, 99.99999-.9 is not 99

The second one is right.
 
Werg22 said:
Office_Shredder said:
This is not how subtraction is done

100-.9=99?

99.9999999... -.9=99.1?

Both wrong. Even if we assume that you flipped the equation so 100-.9=99.1, 99.99999-.9 is not 99
The second one is right.

Umm... both 100-.9=99 and 99.999...-.9=99.1 are wrong. So I don't know what you're on about, plus it would've been a lot easier for the reader to determine which "second one" you're talking about by quoting just the relevant equality, not the entire post.
 
Mentallic said:
Umm... both 100-.9=99 and 99.999...-.9=99.1 are wrong. So I don't know what you're on about, plus it would've been a lot easier for the reader to determine which "second one" you're talking about by quoting just the relevant equality, not the entire post.

No, 99.9999...-0.9 = 99.0999... = 99.1 is correct.
 
Mentallic said:
Umm... both 100-.9=99 and 99.999...-.9=99.1 are wrong. So I don't know what you're on about, plus it would've been a lot easier for the reader to determine which "second one" you're talking about by quoting just the relevant equality, not the entire post.

There was nothing wrong with what Werg said. Yes [itex](99.9999... - 0.9)[/itex] really is equal to 99.1.

I can't believe this senseless OP is going to come back to yet another [itex]0.9999... \neq 1[/itex] debate. :confused: