Is 550 the Correct Remainder for the Sum of the Series in Modular Arithmetic?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter saadsarfraz
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on finding the remainder when the sum of the series \(1 + 2 + 2^2 + \ldots + 2^{219}\) is divided by 5, exploring modular arithmetic and the properties of geometric series.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that the sum can be computed by recognizing a repeating pattern in the residues of powers of 2 modulo 5.
  • Another participant questions the initial computation, pointing out potential errors in the number of residues considered and whether the remainder can exceed the divisor.
  • A later reply acknowledges the repeating pattern and suggests that the sum can be expressed in terms of congruences.
  • There is a discussion about finding the least residue of 550 modulo 5, with one participant confirming that it is 0.
  • Another participant suggests considering a more direct approach to summing the series, hinting at the geometric series formula.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correctness of the initial computation and the method of finding the remainder. There is no consensus on the best approach to the problem, and some uncertainty remains regarding the calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully resolved the implications of the errors pointed out, such as the correct number of residues and the method for computing the sum directly. The discussion reflects various assumptions about modular arithmetic and series evaluation.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in modular arithmetic, geometric series, and mathematical problem-solving techniques may find this discussion relevant.

saadsarfraz
Messages
86
Reaction score
1
Q- What is the remainder when 1+2+2[tex]^{2}[/tex]+...+2[tex]^{219}[/tex] is divided by 5.

Solution: 2[tex]^{0}[/tex]=1 mod5
2[tex]^{1}[/tex]=2 mod5
2[tex]^{2}[/tex]=4 mod5
2[tex]^{3}[/tex]=3 mod5
2[tex]^{4}[/tex]=1 mod5

Now I take (1,2,4,3) to be a set numbers. Since the summation goes to 219, there are a total of 220/4 = 55 sets. So I add 1+2+4+3= 10 and 10*55 = 550 <- my answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can anyone see if this is correct.
 
No, it has a couple of errors. First, how many residues did you compute (4 or 5)? Or how many congruence classes are there modulo 5?

Second, can the remainder exceed the divisor?
 
i computed 4 residues, the pattern 1,2,3,4 keeps on repeating. you are right about remainder exceeding the divisor. any ideas about how i should compute this?
 
Oops, I made a silly mistake. You are correct that the pattern 1,2,4,3 is repeating, since [itex]2^{m+4} \equiv 2^m ~(mod 5)[/itex].

So you have found out that:

[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{219}2^n \equiv 550~(mod 5)[/tex]

What is the least residue of 550 (mod 5)? That is the required answer.

Now alternatively, you should also be capable of identifying the kind of series that is given to you and evaluating it directly (before looking at congruences).
 
so 550 mod 5 is 0, as that leaves no remainder right?
 
Correct.

Have you thought about the more direct approach, by summing the series?
 
Geometric series?

Doesn't that sum to [tex]2^{220} - 1[/tex]?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K