Is 550 the Correct Remainder for the Sum of the Series in Modular Arithmetic?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter saadsarfraz
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 3K views
saadsarfraz
Messages
86
Reaction score
1
Q- What is the remainder when 1+2+2[tex]^{2}[/tex]+...+2[tex]^{219}[/tex] is divided by 5.

Solution: 2[tex]^{0}[/tex]=1 mod5
2[tex]^{1}[/tex]=2 mod5
2[tex]^{2}[/tex]=4 mod5
2[tex]^{3}[/tex]=3 mod5
2[tex]^{4}[/tex]=1 mod5

Now I take (1,2,4,3) to be a set numbers. Since the summation goes to 219, there are a total of 220/4 = 55 sets. So I add 1+2+4+3= 10 and 10*55 = 550 <- my answer.
 
on Phys.org
Can anyone see if this is correct.
 
No, it has a couple of errors. First, how many residues did you compute (4 or 5)? Or how many congruence classes are there modulo 5?

Second, can the remainder exceed the divisor?
 
i computed 4 residues, the pattern 1,2,3,4 keeps on repeating. you are right about remainder exceeding the divisor. any ideas about how i should compute this?
 
Oops, I made a silly mistake. You are correct that the pattern 1,2,4,3 is repeating, since [itex]2^{m+4} \equiv 2^m ~(mod 5)[/itex].

So you have found out that:

[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{219}2^n \equiv 550~(mod 5)[/tex]

What is the least residue of 550 (mod 5)? That is the required answer.

Now alternatively, you should also be capable of identifying the kind of series that is given to you and evaluating it directly (before looking at congruences).
 
so 550 mod 5 is 0, as that leaves no remainder right?
 
Geometric series?

Doesn't that sum to [tex]2^{220} - 1[/tex]?