Is 600J the Minimum Heat Transfer to Maintain Entropy in a Thermodynamic Cycle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bigfoots mum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Entropy
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the minimum heat transfer required to maintain entropy in a thermodynamic cycle. The working substance absorbs heat Q1 = 1000J from a reservoir at T1 = 1000K and Q2 = 2000J from a reservoir at T2 = 2000K. To comply with the second law of thermodynamics, the minimum heat transfer to the reservoir at T3 = 300K must be 600J. This conclusion is based on the requirement that the total entropy change of the system must be greater than or equal to zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the second law of thermodynamics
  • Knowledge of entropy and its implications in thermodynamic cycles
  • Familiarity with heat transfer concepts
  • Basic principles of thermodynamic reservoirs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the second law of thermodynamics in various thermodynamic processes
  • Explore the calculations of entropy change in closed systems
  • Learn about different types of thermodynamic cycles, such as Carnot and Rankine cycles
  • Investigate heat transfer methods and their efficiency in thermodynamic systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of thermodynamics, engineers working with heat engines, and anyone interested in the principles of energy transfer and entropy management in thermodynamic cycles.

Bigfoots mum
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi, i just want to check my reasoning on this problem.

A working substance is taken around a closed cycle that involves performing some external work. It absorbes heat Q1 = 1000J from a resevoir at T1 = 1000K, and heat Q2 = 2000J from a resevoir at T2 =2000K. The only other exchange of heat is with a resevoir at T3 = 300K.
What is the minimum heat that must have been transferred from the substance to the resevoir at T3 ( explain your reasoning)?

Now i think the minimum heat is 600J, as the entropy change of the system must be >= 0, and we must have heat rejection otherwise we'd violate the 2nd law. Is this ok?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Bigfoots mum, welcome to PF. Your reasoning looks good to me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K