MHB Is 7 the Answer to This Simple Riddle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yankel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Riddle
AI Thread Summary
The correct answer to the riddle is 7, which can be achieved by properly grouping the numbers as 6 - (1 x 0) + (2 ÷ 2). Many people mistakenly solve it left-to-right, leading to an incorrect answer of 2. The discussion highlights how such riddles are often used on social media to boost engagement and web traffic. This method of presenting riddles can be seen as more positive compared to other sensational content. Overall, the riddle serves as a reminder of the importance of mathematical grouping in problem-solving.
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
I say 7, could I be wrong ?

View attachment 4786

:cool:
 

Attachments

  • 53b6aa3e-e485-4038-a465-f8ed4240f297-original.jpeg
    53b6aa3e-e485-4038-a465-f8ed4240f297-original.jpeg
    19.4 KB · Views: 117
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, it is 7.

-Dan
 
Most people will try to solve it "as they read": left-to-right:

6 - 1 = 5

5 x 0 = 0

0 + 2 = 2

2 $\div$ 2 = 1

This is incorrect.

The "proper" (if somewhat ambiguous, given the context) grouping is:

6-(1$\times$0)+(2$\div$2)
 
Yes, it is 7. And people on Facebook keep using this kind of "riddle" to gain likes and shares to increase their accounts' web traffic. It is a bit better rather than showing some suffering people in third world countries, though.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top