Is α a Primitive Element Modulo p Given α^q ≡ -1 mod p?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hope2009
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Element Primitive
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that α is a primitive element modulo p if and only if α^q ≡ -1 mod p, given that p and q are odd primes with p = 2q + 1. Participants reference Fermat's Little Theorem, emphasizing that if α is a primitive root, its powers modulo p must be distinct, thus covering the p-1 residue system. There is a clarification regarding the condition that α^q should be considered modulo p rather than q. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the properties of Sophie Germain primes in this context. Overall, the thread seeks to resolve a mathematical proof related to primitive elements in modular arithmetic.
hope2009
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Suppose that p and q are odd primes and p=2q+1. Suppose that
α∈ Z_p^*,α≢±1 mod p.

Prove that α is primitive element modulo p if and only if α^q≡-1 mod q.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That sounds like a homework problem?? Do you think?
 
I don't get any response on this. But since q is a "Sofie Germain Prime," then q=(p-1)/2.

By Fermat's Little Theorem z^(p-1) ==1 Mod p. IF a number is a primitive root--which I take is what he means here- no extensions are mentioned; then all its powers Modulo p must differ, giving us the p-1 residue system. ;

To do this, a^(p-1)/2 ==-1 Mod p. Since if it was 1, then a would not generate all the elements.
 
Last edited:
robert Ihnot said:
I don't get any response on this. But since q is a "Sofie Germain Prime," then q=(p-1)/2.

By Fermat's Little Theorem z^(p-1) ==1 Mod p. IF a number is a primitive root--which I take is what he means here- no extensions are mentioned; then all its powers Modulo p must differ, giving us the p-1 residue system. ;

To do this, a^(p-1)/2 ==-1 Mod p. Since if it was 1, then a would not generate all the elements.

thanks a lot i really appreciate your help
 
hope2009: thanks a lot i really appreciate your help

Happy to hear you are satisifed. However, there is an error I see now:

Prove that α is primitive element modulo p if and only if α^q≡-1 mod q.

You mean a^q \equiv -1 \bmod p Since by Fermat's little theorem for a prime, a^q \equiv a \bmod q
 
Last edited:
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K