Is a Complex Probability Result Valid in a Quantum Measurement?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
Bacat
Messages
149
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Consider a quantum system described by a basis [tex]\mid 1 \rangle[/tex] and [tex]\mid 2 \rangle[/tex].

The system is initially in the state: [tex]\psi_i = \frac{i}{\sqrt3} \mid 1 \rangle + \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}} \mid 2 \rangle[/tex].

(a) Find the probability that the initial system is measured to be in the state: [tex]\psi_f = \frac{1 + i}{\sqrt 3} \mid 1 \rangle + \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} \mid 2 \rangle[/tex]

Homework Equations



The basis is assumed to be orthonormal, hence [tex]\langle 1 \mid 1 \rangle = \langle 2 \mid 2 \rangle = 1[/tex]

Probability is calculated as [tex](\langle \psi_f \mid \psi_i \rangle)^2[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Calculating this, I get a complex answer. I'm not sure but I think a probability (a real observable) should be a real number. Is that right?

The answer I get is [tex]\frac{2 + 2\sqrt{2}}{9}(1+i)[/tex].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I just tried to normalize the two states and found that they are both unit-normal already...

This is confusing.
 
Bacat said:
Probability is calculated as [tex](\langle \psi_f \mid \psi_i \rangle)^2[/tex]

Surely you mean:

[tex]\frac{\langle \psi_i \vert \psi_f \rangle \langle \psi_f \vert \psi_i \rangle}{\langle \psi_i \vert \psi_i \rangle \langle \psi_f \vert \psi_f \rangle}=\vert\langle \psi_i \vert \psi_f \rangle \vert^2[/tex]

(for normalized [itex]\psi_i[/itex] and [itex]\psi_f[/itex])...right?:wink:
 
Thanks for the response ggh.

Since my states are normalized, the denominator drops to 1. The numerator seems correct. I think you are right that I missed the absolute value signs.

...

After a quick calculation, I see that's where I screwed up. I get a real answer if I take the absolute value before squaring.

Thanks!