Programs Is a Computer Science Background Enough for an MS in Astrophysics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the consideration of pursuing an MS in Physics at a local university that lacks a dedicated Astronomy/Astrophysics program. The individual has a background in Computer Science and Information Technology and is contemplating whether studying Applied Physics would be beneficial despite it not aligning directly with their interest in Astrophysics. Concerns are raised about the job market in astrophysics, which is noted to be poor unless one is a top candidate for graduate school. Suggestions include self-study and focusing on computer simulation techniques applicable to astrophysics, which could also lead to lucrative opportunities in machine learning. Additionally, there is caution regarding the adequacy of the individual's background for graduate-level physics, emphasizing the importance of being well-prepared for advanced studies rather than settling for a less relevant program. The consensus leans towards pursuing a more suitable program that aligns with the individual's specific interests in astrophysics.
frizzlefrazzle
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Looking for thoughts. I have recently gained an interest in Astrophysics and have considered going back to school to study the subject. I have a BS in Computer Science, and an MS in Information Technology and I believe my background is close enough to consider an MS program in Physics. However, although my local university has MS/PhD programs in Physics, they have nothing focusing on Astronomy/Astrophysics. There are maybe 1-2 courses actually designated as such but I believe they are both undergraduate and certainly nothing exists at the graduate level. The MS program itself is in Applied Physics only. My question is - would it be a waste of time to attempt to study at this school in particular? Although it would be nice just to pick up and move to another area, I wouldn't be able to for the foreseeable future. And at the same time I know it wouldn't be a waste to gain more advanced knowledge of physics in general even though it's not in the particular field I want to study. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you should consider it more of a hobby and do self-study for interest. The job market is extremely poor in astrophysics unless you're an outstanding graduate school candidate.

You could for example take courses in computer simulation and then apply it to astrophysics problems modeling stars, black holes or galaxies and other interesting phenomena. The computer simulation stuff could be used in machine learning work which is pretty high paying then once you have enough money to buy a university then you an go back to school and enjoy studying it for fun.
 
And I guess I should say, I really am only doing it out of pure interest, I already have a career in computing. So technically I could continue to learn it on my own as I have been, it's just more difficult without a formal education.
 
frizzlefrazzle said:
I have a BS in Computer Science, and an MS in Information Technology and I believe my background is close enough to consider an MS program in Physics.

Did you complete many senior level physics courses during your computer science degree? The reason I bring this up is because generally speaking a Computer Science degree in and of itself does not usually fit into the "or equivalent" part of the requirements for admission to the graduate program being "a BSc in physics or equivalent." And while you background and any self-teaching you may have done might make you feel prepared, you could very easily get yourself in over your head by enrolling in a master's degree that you're not prepared for (assuming you were able to get in).

If you really want a graduate education in astrophysics, it's probably best to take the time to jump through the hoops and get into a program that you really want to get into rather than trying to shoehorn yourself into an option that looks like the best option at the time.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top