Is a Cusp Considered an Inflection Point in Calculus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sickle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Points
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

An inflection point in calculus is defined as a point where the curvature of a curve changes, specifically where the second derivative changes its sign. A cusp, or corner point, does not qualify as an inflection point because it does not represent a change in concavity. The discussion highlights the distinction between inflection points and critical points, emphasizing that inflection points occur where the second derivative is zero and defined in a neighborhood, while critical points are where the first derivative is zero or undefined. Textbooks by Stewart and Thomas present conflicting information on this topic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second derivatives in calculus
  • Familiarity with the concepts of curvature and concavity
  • Knowledge of critical points and their definitions
  • Basic proficiency in analyzing functions and their graphs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definitions and properties of inflection points in calculus
  • Learn how to determine curvature changes using second derivatives
  • Explore the differences between critical points and inflection points
  • Review examples of functions with inflection points, such as y=x^3 and y=Sin[x]
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone seeking clarity on the concepts of inflection points and curvature in mathematical analysis.

sickle
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
is a point only considered an inflection point if a tangent (whether vertical or not) exists or just whether just that f(c) is continuous suffices.

For instance, is a cusp/corner point eligible for being inflection?

It seems that my textbooks (stewart vs thomas) have conflicting info (as always...><)

if it just another matter of taste?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
an inflection point is a point where a curve changes the sign of its curvature.
at maximums and minimums, functions do not change its curvature.

for example the curve y=Sin[x] changes its curvature when x=n*Pi, for n=...-2,-1,0,1,2...
the curve y=x^3 has an inflection point at x=0

since the sign of the curvature is always the same as the sign of the second derivative, an equivalent definition is: a point where the second derivative changes its sign (but second derivative is not the same as curvature)

you might have read, as another definition, that an inflection point is a point where f' is an extremum. which is equivalent to the definition above, since f'=extremum implies f''=0 and f'' will have a different sign at each side of the point. notice that it is f' that must be an extremum, not f.
 
Inflection points are not quite the same as critical points of the first derivative. While critical points are those values where f'(x)=0 or f'(x) is undefined, inflection points are those points where f''(x)=0 provided f"(x) is defined in a neighborhood of the point.

So no, a cusp is not a change in concavity.
 
I've encountered a few different definitions of "indefinite integral," denoted ##\int f(x) \, dx##. any particular antiderivative ##F:\mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}, F'(x) = f(x)## the set of all antiderivatives ##\{F:\mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}, F'(x) = f(x)\}## a "canonical" antiderivative any expression of the form ##\int_a^x f(x) \, dx##, where ##a## is in the domain of ##f## and ##f## is continuous Sometimes, it becomes a little unclear which definition an author really has in mind, though...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K