MHB Is a Group Abelian if Inverses Commute?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cbarker1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Dear Everyone,

Here is the problem that I am attempting to prove:

"Prove that a group $(G,\star)$ is abelian if and only if ${(a\star b)}^{-1}={a}^{-1}\star {b}^{-1}$ for all a and b in $G$."

My attempt:
Let $(G,\star)$ be a group $G$ under the binary operation $\star$. Then suppose $G$ is abelian. Then we know that $G$ has the associative property; there is an identity element $e$ in $G$; there is an inverse element for each $x$ in $G$. We know that $\star$ is commutative under $G$. So for all $a,b\in G$, $(a\star b)\in G$. Then ${(a\star b)}^{-1}\in G$. Then, by proposition 1 ( abstract Algebra, Dummit Foote second edition page 18), ${(a\star b)}^{-1}={b}^{-1} \star {a}^{-1}$. But we that $G$ is a abelian, so ${b}^{-1} \star {a}^{-1}={a}^{-1} \star {b}^{-1}$.

I am having trouble with the converse of this problem. Any suggestions on my attempt will be appreciated.

Thanks,
Cbarker1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So, assume $(ab)^{-1}=a^{-1}b^{-1}$ for all $a,b\in G$. We want to show that $ab=ba$ for all $a,b\in G$. We have that
$ab(ab)^{-1}=e,$ but it's also the case that $abb^{-1}a^{-1}=e$, by the same theorem you quoted earlier. By assumption, $aba^{-1}b^{-1}=e$. What we want to show is equivalent to $b^{-1}aba^{-1}=e$. Take this:
\begin{align*}
ab&=ab \\
b^{-1}aba^{-1}&=b^{-1}aba^{-1} \\
b^{-1}aba^{-1}&=(a^{-1}b)^{-1}ba^{-1} \\
b^{-1}aba^{-1}&=ab^{-1}ba^{-1} \\
b^{-1}aba^{-1}&=aa^{-1} \\
b^{-1}aba^{-1}&=e,
\end{align*}
as required.
 
By Dummit & Foote Proposition 1, $(ba)^{-1}=a^{-1}b^{-1}$. If also $(ab)^{-1}=a^{-1}b^{-1}$, then
$$\begin{align*}(ba)^{-1} &= a^{-1}b^{-1} = (ab)^{-1} \\\\ ab(ba)^{-1} &= ab(ab)^{-1} = e \\\\ [ab(ba)^{-1}]ba &= eba = ba \\\\ ab[(ba)^{-1}ba] &= ba \\\\ ab &= ba\end{align*}$$
showing that the group is Abelian.
 
Last edited:
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
569
Replies
3
Views
435
Back
Top