MHB Is a Group Abelian if Inverses Commute?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cbarker1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Dear Everyone,

Here is the problem that I am attempting to prove:

"Prove that a group $(G,\star)$ is abelian if and only if ${(a\star b)}^{-1}={a}^{-1}\star {b}^{-1}$ for all a and b in $G$."

My attempt:
Let $(G,\star)$ be a group $G$ under the binary operation $\star$. Then suppose $G$ is abelian. Then we know that $G$ has the associative property; there is an identity element $e$ in $G$; there is an inverse element for each $x$ in $G$. We know that $\star$ is commutative under $G$. So for all $a,b\in G$, $(a\star b)\in G$. Then ${(a\star b)}^{-1}\in G$. Then, by proposition 1 ( abstract Algebra, Dummit Foote second edition page 18), ${(a\star b)}^{-1}={b}^{-1} \star {a}^{-1}$. But we that $G$ is a abelian, so ${b}^{-1} \star {a}^{-1}={a}^{-1} \star {b}^{-1}$.

I am having trouble with the converse of this problem. Any suggestions on my attempt will be appreciated.

Thanks,
Cbarker1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So, assume $(ab)^{-1}=a^{-1}b^{-1}$ for all $a,b\in G$. We want to show that $ab=ba$ for all $a,b\in G$. We have that
$ab(ab)^{-1}=e,$ but it's also the case that $abb^{-1}a^{-1}=e$, by the same theorem you quoted earlier. By assumption, $aba^{-1}b^{-1}=e$. What we want to show is equivalent to $b^{-1}aba^{-1}=e$. Take this:
\begin{align*}
ab&=ab \\
b^{-1}aba^{-1}&=b^{-1}aba^{-1} \\
b^{-1}aba^{-1}&=(a^{-1}b)^{-1}ba^{-1} \\
b^{-1}aba^{-1}&=ab^{-1}ba^{-1} \\
b^{-1}aba^{-1}&=aa^{-1} \\
b^{-1}aba^{-1}&=e,
\end{align*}
as required.
 
By Dummit & Foote Proposition 1, $(ba)^{-1}=a^{-1}b^{-1}$. If also $(ab)^{-1}=a^{-1}b^{-1}$, then
$$\begin{align*}(ba)^{-1} &= a^{-1}b^{-1} = (ab)^{-1} \\\\ ab(ba)^{-1} &= ab(ab)^{-1} = e \\\\ [ab(ba)^{-1}]ba &= eba = ba \\\\ ab[(ba)^{-1}ba] &= ba \\\\ ab &= ba\end{align*}$$
showing that the group is Abelian.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
396
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
713
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
986
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
387
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
756