MHB Is a Group Abelian if Inverses Commute?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cbarker1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A group \( (G, \star) \) is abelian if and only if the inverse of the product of any two elements equals the product of their inverses in reverse order, expressed as \( (a \star b)^{-1} = a^{-1} \star b^{-1} \) for all \( a, b \in G \). The proof involves demonstrating that if this condition holds, then \( ab = ba \) for all \( a, b \in G \). The discussion references Proposition 1 from "Abstract Algebra" by Dummit and Foote, which establishes the relationship between inverses in groups.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, specifically group operations and properties.
  • Familiarity with the definitions of abelian groups and inverse elements.
  • Knowledge of associative properties in algebraic structures.
  • Experience with proofs in abstract algebra, particularly using propositions from standard texts.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of abelian groups in detail, focusing on their implications in group theory.
  • Explore the concept of group homomorphisms and their relationship with abelian structures.
  • Learn about the significance of the identity element and inverses in various algebraic systems.
  • Review additional proofs related to group properties from "Abstract Algebra" by Dummit and Foote.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in understanding the foundational properties of group theory and abelian groups.

cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Dear Everyone,

Here is the problem that I am attempting to prove:

"Prove that a group $(G,\star)$ is abelian if and only if ${(a\star b)}^{-1}={a}^{-1}\star {b}^{-1}$ for all a and b in $G$."

My attempt:
Let $(G,\star)$ be a group $G$ under the binary operation $\star$. Then suppose $G$ is abelian. Then we know that $G$ has the associative property; there is an identity element $e$ in $G$; there is an inverse element for each $x$ in $G$. We know that $\star$ is commutative under $G$. So for all $a,b\in G$, $(a\star b)\in G$. Then ${(a\star b)}^{-1}\in G$. Then, by proposition 1 ( abstract Algebra, Dummit Foote second edition page 18), ${(a\star b)}^{-1}={b}^{-1} \star {a}^{-1}$. But we that $G$ is a abelian, so ${b}^{-1} \star {a}^{-1}={a}^{-1} \star {b}^{-1}$.

I am having trouble with the converse of this problem. Any suggestions on my attempt will be appreciated.

Thanks,
Cbarker1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So, assume $(ab)^{-1}=a^{-1}b^{-1}$ for all $a,b\in G$. We want to show that $ab=ba$ for all $a,b\in G$. We have that
$ab(ab)^{-1}=e,$ but it's also the case that $abb^{-1}a^{-1}=e$, by the same theorem you quoted earlier. By assumption, $aba^{-1}b^{-1}=e$. What we want to show is equivalent to $b^{-1}aba^{-1}=e$. Take this:
\begin{align*}
ab&=ab \\
b^{-1}aba^{-1}&=b^{-1}aba^{-1} \\
b^{-1}aba^{-1}&=(a^{-1}b)^{-1}ba^{-1} \\
b^{-1}aba^{-1}&=ab^{-1}ba^{-1} \\
b^{-1}aba^{-1}&=aa^{-1} \\
b^{-1}aba^{-1}&=e,
\end{align*}
as required.
 
By Dummit & Foote Proposition 1, $(ba)^{-1}=a^{-1}b^{-1}$. If also $(ab)^{-1}=a^{-1}b^{-1}$, then
$$\begin{align*}(ba)^{-1} &= a^{-1}b^{-1} = (ab)^{-1} \\\\ ab(ba)^{-1} &= ab(ab)^{-1} = e \\\\ [ab(ba)^{-1}]ba &= eba = ba \\\\ ab[(ba)^{-1}ba] &= ba \\\\ ab &= ba\end{align*}$$
showing that the group is Abelian.
 
Last edited:
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
564
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
887
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
567
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
911