Is a (hyper)sphere a (hyper)plane in spherical coordinates?

Click For Summary
A sphere cannot be considered a plane, regardless of the coordinate system used, including spherical coordinates. The discussion highlights the distinction between geometric objects and their representation in different coordinate systems. The John-Radon transform's applicability to curvilinear coordinates is questioned, emphasizing that k-planes and spheres are fundamentally different. The assertion that a sphere can be expressed as a plane in spherical coordinates is deemed overly simplistic. Ultimately, the geometric nature of spheres and planes remains independent of their mathematical representation.
bers
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi,
can I say that a sphere is a plane, because in spherical coordinates, I can simply express it as <(r, \theta, \varphi)^T, (1, 0, 0)^T> = R? It does sound too easy to me. I'm asking because I'm thinking about whether it is valid to generalize results from the John-Radon transform (over k-planes in an n-dimensional space) to curvilinear coordinates. In the book I'm reading (Analytic tomography), a k-plane is the set of points x in ℝn with <x, u> = c, with c real and u any unit vector in ℝn. Clearly, R is real and (r, \theta, \varphi) = (1, 0, 0)^T is a unit vector in ℝn.

I believe the above is invalid because the dot product is expressed differently in spherical coordinates - is that already the answer?

Thanks
bers
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
"Sphere" and "plane" are geometric objects and so completely independent of the coordinate system. They are not the same thing no matter what coordinate system you use.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K