MHB Is a Mixture of Three Chemical Solutions a Group?

  • Thread starter Thread starter poissonspot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group
poissonspot
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Would it be correct to call mixture of three chemical solutions, namely salt water, salt water with sodium hydroxide, and salt water with HCl, a group? As I understand this, (which is not entirely realistic) mixture of solutions is associative and closed, salt water would be the identity which is yielded from the mixture of the NaOH solution and HCl solution, assuming that all of the NaOH and HCl react to yield NaCl. The only reason I ask, is because mixing a solution with itself yields the same solution, and this is different from other groups like Z3. In the definition of a group I notice that the identity must hold for all elements and since this is not the case and the elements are not simply trivial copies of another, I would say there is only one identity. However, I am still hesitant to accept this example. Thanks for any input.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
conscipost said:
Would it be correct to call mixture of three chemical solutions, namely salt water, salt water with sodium hydroxide, and salt water with HCl, a group? As I understand this, (which is not entirely realistic) mixture of solutions is associative and closed, salt water would be the identity which is yielded from the mixture of the NaOH solution and HCl solution, assuming that all of the NaOH and HCl react to yield NaCl. The only reason I ask, is because mixing a solution with itself yields the same solution, and this is different from other groups like Z3. In the definition of a group I notice that the identity must hold for all elements and since this is not the case and the elements are not simply trivial copies of another, I would say there is only one identity. However, I am still hesitant to accept this example. Thanks for any input.

Basically, this questions asks whether 3 elements: a, b, e with the following properties:

a^2=a
b^2=b
e^2=e
ea=ae=a
eb=be=b
ab=ba=e

form a group.

My answer is no, because it is not isomorphic to $Z_3$.

Simpler reason:
(ab)b=eb=b
a(bb)=ab=e
Associative property is not satisfied.
 
Last edited:
Alexmahone said:
Basically, this questions asks whether 3 elements: a, b, e with the following properties:

a^2=a
b^2=b
e^2=e
ea=ae=a
eb=be=b
ab=ba=e

form a group.

My answer is no, because it is not isomorphic to $Z_3$.

Simpler reason:
(ab)b=eb=b
a(bb)=ab=e
Associative property is not satisfied.

That's true. Thanks for pointing that out.
I suppose at the least it is an interesting counter example.

If concentration was considered I can imagine this situation working though.
So, b+b=2b and a+(2b)=b. This would leave the 3 element structure it has now, and I suppose would be isomorphic to (Z,+) where multiples of a are negative integers and multiples of b positive integers.
 
Last edited:
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top