Is a Monoid the Same as a Semi-group in Topology?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the definitions of monoids and semi-groups in the context of topology and mathematics. Participants explore the nuances of terminology and the implications of differing definitions across various sources.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that their topology teacher defines a monoid as a set with an associative binary operation but no identity element, which contrasts with the definition of a semi-group found on Wikipedia.
  • Another participant expresses concern about the potential for conflict when discussing terminology with the professor, suggesting that semi-groups typically refer to associative binary operations, while monoids include an identity element.
  • A different participant recommends informing the professor about alternative definitions found in standard references, such as Rotman's Theory of Groups.
  • One participant emphasizes that terminology is less important than the definitions themselves and suggests that the confusion may arise from variations in textbooks.
  • Another participant highlights the lack of standardization in mathematical definitions, noting that different sources may present concepts in varying ways.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that there is a lack of consensus on the definitions of monoids and semi-groups, with multiple competing views and references cited. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct terminology.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that definitions can vary significantly across different mathematical texts, which may lead to confusion and differing interpretations of terms like monoid and semi-group.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
My topology teacher appears to call a monoid a set with an associative binary operation, but with no identity element. According to wiki, this is the definition of a semi-group, although they remark that some authors define semi-groups as having an identity (i.e. synonymously to monoid). But they don't say on the monoid article that some authors take monoid to mean an associative magma(groupoid) with no identity.

So, does my teacher simply has the definitions mixed up or do some authors effectively call 'monoid' an associative magma(groupoid)?

I wanted to ask here before throwing the "Sir professor, according to wikipedia, you're wrong" at him. I'm sure that's understandable. :rolleyes:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IMOH, arguments over terminology are politically dangerous, only attempt this if you are on good terms with your professor, or want to start a fight.

In my experience, semi-group means associative binary operation, and monoid means associative binary operation with identity element. Wolfram's mathworld agrees: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Monoid.html, I usually trust Wolfram for ORTHODOX definitions, wikipedia is good at bringing in side issues and lesser known usage (ok, that's my subjective opinion).
 
Yeah, I wouldn't recommend telling him he's "wrong", but you might want to tell him that you've seen it mean something else in (many) other standard references. Like, for example, in Rotman's Theory of Groups.
 
You could tell him. Though he's likely to be unimpressed that you used Wiki as a source, and even less impressed that you're worrying about this than actually learning the course.

It's just a name, and mostly unimportant. It is the definition that is important. Ok, it might cause you some confusion when looking in other textbooks.
 
ecurbian said:
IMOH, arguments over terminology are politically dangerous, only attempt this if you are on good terms with your professor, or want to start a fight.
Quite a lot of even modern mathematical definitions are not standardised with subtle and not so subtle differences cropping up all over the place. Many books will even use different "derivation trees" if you will to arrive at some concepts and objects earlier or later than others would.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K