Is a problem-based approach beneficial for engineering education?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tamtam402
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Approach Education
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the benefits of a problem-based approach to engineering education, specifically in electrical engineering programs. Participants highlight a model where students tackle real-world problems every two weeks, collaborating in groups and engaging in personal study and lab work. This contrasts with traditional lecture-based courses. The Moore method is mentioned as a similar educational strategy that emphasizes student-led problem solving and presentations, gaining traction in various universities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of problem-based learning methodologies
  • Familiarity with the Moore method in mathematics education
  • Knowledge of electrical engineering concepts and practices
  • Experience with collaborative learning environments
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effectiveness of problem-based learning in engineering education
  • Explore the Moore method and its application in various disciplines
  • Investigate universities that implement problem-based approaches in their curricula
  • Learn about assessment methods used in problem-based learning environments
USEFUL FOR

Engineering students, educators in higher education, curriculum developers, and anyone interested in innovative teaching methodologies in technical fields.

tamtam402
Messages
199
Reaction score
0
"Problem approach" education?

Sorry I don't know the exact name for this kind of education in english. One of the Universities I'd like to attend offers a problem based approach for it's electrical engineering degree (I want to become a EE). Basically, you are given a problem every 2 weeks that you have to "solve". The week starts by a meeting with a professor in groups of 12-15 students to brainstorm about the problem and the things required to solve it. After that, there's a personal study time where you have to read and do some exercises on a given subject. You then have to do some lab work, or work in teams, and "solve" the problem given to you. At the end of the 2 weeks you have an exam (maybe a written math exam if the problem resolved more around maths, maybe some programmation if that's what the 2 weeks problem was about, etc.), and you have to present your solution.

The other universities offer a "traditional" approach, with courses given to you. The problem approach doesn't really have courses per se.

Anyone have input on this? Should I stick to the tried and true "course" formula, or try the "problem solving approach"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


In mathematics, there is the Moore method, which has gained some traction at a number of universities. It is somewhat similar to what you have described: instead of presenting a traditional lecture, the instructor outlines a list of theorems and problems, and the students are expected to solve them (sometimes individually, sometimes in groups) and present their results in class.

Here is a website in which an instructor discusses his experience teaching Moore method classes over a period of 30 years at several universities:

http://legacyrlmoore.org/reference/mahavier1.html

I don't have any personal experience with the Moore method so cannot comment further.
 


I like the sounds of it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K