Is a projection operator hermitian?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether a projection operator P is Hermitian, referencing a theorem from "Lie Algebras in Physics" by Georgi. The argument presented shows that if P satisfies the equation PD(g)P = D(g)P and its adjoint, it implies P is Hermitian. It is noted that in quantum mechanics, Hermitian operators yield real eigenvalues, which supports the assertion that projection operators must be Hermitian. The consensus is that all projection operators are indeed Hermitian, reinforcing their properties in both mathematical and physical contexts. Understanding these properties is essential for applications in quantum mechanics.
krishna mohan
Messages
114
Reaction score
0
I was reading Lie Algebras in Physics by Georgi......second edition...

Theorem 1.2: He proves that every finite group is completely reducible.

He takes

PD(g)P=D(g)P


..takes adjoint...and gets..

P{D(g)}{\dagger} P=P {D(g)}{\dagger}

So..does this mean that the projection operator P is hermitian?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
krishna mohan said:
I was reading Lie Algebras in Physics by Georgi......second edition...

Theorem 1.2: He proves that every finite group is completely reducible.

He takes

PD(g)P=D(g)P


..takes adjoint...and gets..

P{D(g)}{\dagger} P=P {D(g)}{\dagger}

So..does this mean that the projection operator P is hermitian?

I think he is assuming P is Hermitian (as it must be; if you want to think of this in terms of QM, it leaves all states unchanged, so the eigenvalue associated with the operator is '1', a real number - any operator which outputs a real eigenvalue is Hermitian)
 
All projection operators are hermitian. You might want to review the properties of projection operators here.
 
Thanks a lot!:smile:
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
892
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K