Is a Universal Definition of Intelligence and Life Possible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FZ+
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of establishing a universal definition of intelligence and life. Participants explore the challenges of defining these concepts, considering philosophical, biological, and intuitive perspectives. The scope includes theoretical and conceptual analysis, with an emphasis on the implications of definitions in various contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that a positive definition of intelligence and life is impossible due to the infinite nature of negatives, examples, and intuitive concepts.
  • Others suggest that the usefulness of the term "life" in biology indicates that some distinctions can be made, despite the lack of a precise definition.
  • There is a contention regarding whether science is based on faith or if faith plays a role in scientific inquiry, with some asserting that these views are artifacts of differing worldviews.
  • One participant notes that definitions in biology are often limited and may not apply universally, particularly when considering entities like viruses.
  • Concerns are raised about the ambiguity of terms like "complexity" and how they complicate discussions about life and intelligence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the definitions of intelligence and life, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved. There is no consensus on whether a universal definition can be achieved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on subjective intuitions, the variability of definitions across different fields, and the unresolved nature of certain philosophical questions regarding the essence of life and intelligence.

  • #31
Jensen's use of the word 'intelligence'

FZ+ said:
Can anyone provide a positive definition of intelligence
http://psycprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/archive/00000086/


  • To avoid confusion between 'intelligence' and the g factor, I have used the word 'intelligence' in an open-ended, generic sense to include various behavioral and cognitive phenomena recognized by psychologists as stimulus apprehension, perception, discrimination, generalization, learning, memory, insight, reasoning, problem solving, and the like. These capacities are the subject matter of both experimental cognitive psychology and artificial intelligence, which can work hand-in-hand in their attempts to model these phenomena, without reference to species differences (i.e., comparative psychology), individual differences (i.e., differential psychology), or neural underpinnings (i.e., cognitive neuropsychology).[/color]


Additionally, we might take note that the M-W Unabridged defines an animal as "an organism of the kingdom Animalia being characterized by ... greater irritability..." It might seem that an organism endowed with Jensen's above-listed traits of intelligent behavior would be more susceptible than a plant to irritation by its environment.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
12K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 169 ·
6
Replies
169
Views
11K
  • · Replies 255 ·
9
Replies
255
Views
32K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K