Is 'Grouping' Intelligence Possible?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the nature of intelligence, particularly as articulated by Jeff Hawkins in his book "On Intelligence," which emphasizes the hierarchical structure of the neocortex as fundamental to human intelligence. Participants explore whether human intelligence is unique or part of a broader set of intelligences that could arise from different material arrangements, including potential alien forms of intelligence. The conversation touches on the philosophical implications of consciousness and whether it is an abstract phenomenon that could manifest in various ways beyond human experience. There is also a debate on the definitions of intelligence, with distinctions made between human and artificial forms. Ultimately, the dialogue invites imaginative speculation about the nature of intelligence and consciousness across different contexts.
  • #51
-Job- said:
I instinctively associate intelligence with understanding. Naturally intelligence may be used in different contexts, but "kinesthetic intelligence" is really stretching the usage of the term, in my opinion.

I would add also that the brain is an anticipation machine as much as a computer is a machine for carrying out arithmetic operations. In a sense, it may have been built with that purpose in mind, but it's much more than that.

Kinesthetic intelligence is an abuse of terminology. I know that you didn't make it up, but I wish people would stop using it. There is a part of intelligence that relates to reaction time, cognitive processing speed, and cognitive accuracy. These are more a part of the "kinesthetic intelligence" than the physical movement itself (which is, at its most basic level, not difficult. It only becomes difficult when conflated with complicated timing/processing variables).

Unfortunately, I'm in mathematics and music, not psychology, so no one takes me seriously :P. However, I think that a more useful model for kinesthetic intelligence would be something called 'chronometric intelligence'. If anyone is interested I can explain it in detail, but it basically just has to do with the ability to have a high processing speed, high accuracy, and a "good sense of timing/rhythm/sequence". (The phrase in quotes can be more specifically defined, but only at length which I will refrain from here). Chronometric intelligence applies to a lot of areas of life that people don't realizes (driving, cooking, ordering events correctly, making decisions under pressure, specialized occupations such as a being a pilot, reacting to unforeseen consequences, etc.).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
kings7 said:
Chronometric intelligence applies to a lot of areas of life that people don't realizes (driving, cooking, ordering events correctly, making decisions under pressure, specialized occupations such as a being a pilot, reacting to unforeseen consequences, etc.).

You could probably define that as procedural memory ability.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procedural_memory
 
  • #53
Math Is Hard said:
You could probably define that as procedural memory ability.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procedural_memory

Good point.

The only thing is that it doesn't account for timing displacement, but the definition of procedural memory could surely be expanded to include this. All we need now are some new fMRI studies and peer-reviewed neuroscience classifications! ;)
 
Back
Top