B Is an infinite universe compatible with cyclic models?

AI Thread Summary
Cyclic models, such as the Big Bounce, propose alternating periods of expansion and contraction, leading to a series of Big Bangs. An infinite universe raises challenges, as it would necessitate an infinite amount of matter to contract into a singularity, which appears implausible. The Big Bounce suggests that quantum phenomena trigger the bounce while maintaining finite density. This mechanism could theoretically occur throughout an infinite universe, similar to how a Big Bang might arise. The compatibility of infinite universes with cyclic models remains a complex topic in cosmology.
TheHeraclitus
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
If space is flat and infinite are cyclic models possible? The answer seems intuitively no but I wonder if it's correct.
Cyclic models for reference.
I will take simple Big Bounce as an example of what I have in mind.
In Big Bounce there periods of expansion and periods of contraction which result in a never-ending series of Big Bangs. However if Universe is infinite in extent this would require infinite amount of matter would have to contract into one point but that seems impossible.
 
Space news on Phys.org
The big bounce implies that quantum things cause the bounce while the universe still has finite density. That could happen everywhere in a spacially infinite universe - in the same way that a big bang can.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes TheHeraclitus

Thread 'Illuminating Black Hole Shadows with Dark Matter Annihilation'

Abstract The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has significantly advanced our ability to study black holes, achieving unprecedented spatial resolution and revealing horizon-scale structures. Notably, these observations feature a distinctive dark shadow—primarily arising from faint jet emissions—surrounded by a bright photon ring. Anticipated upgrades of the EHT promise substantial improvements in dynamic range, enabling deeper exploration of low-background regions, particularly the inner shadow...
View full post »

Thread 'Matter density right after the decoupling'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
View full post »

Similar threads

B Big Bang and Infinite Universe
Replies
20
Views
1K
B Does an infinite universe contradict a Big Bang origin?
2
Replies
65
Views
6K
I Is it time to take the 'bang' out of the Big Bang?
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Big bounce theory in light of the closed Universe finding
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Question re flat infinite universe with a preferred direction
Replies
5
Views
2K
A Largest Galaxy In An Infinite Universe
Replies
12
Views
2K
B The infinite and the infinitesimal
Replies
10
Views
3K
I Difference between oscillatory/cyclic model and big bounce?
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Dark Energy and the Cyclic Universe?
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Is There an Extra Time Dimension in Paul Steinhardt's Cyclic Model?
Replies
4
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top