Is beauty objective?

  • #1
i was just wondering if someone could please help me
i have an exam tm and was wondering if you could please give me some ideas on what to write about
the question is beauty objective??
what does this mean??
thankyou
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
cristo
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
8,107
73
The question could be extended: "Is beauty objective, or is beauty in the eye of the beholder?"
 
  • #3
so what would be some tips on what to write about??
 
  • #4
1,369
0
so what would be some tips on what to write about??

First define your terms.

What is objective?
What is beauty?
 
  • #5
Rade
Let us try these definitions:

Beauty is a sense of harmony of parts of a unit as viewed by the rational consciousness

A Unit is a thing held in the consciousness as being a member of a group of two or more similar members (thus what exists is not the unit but the thing)

To be Objective is to hold that concepts OF VALUE such as beauty of a unit are a dialectic formed in the human consciousness as: (1) determined by the metaphysical reality of the unit, and (2) as discovered and judged by the epistemology (= reason) of the rational consciousness. Thus to be objective is to hold to a dialectic philosophy that entangles metaphysics and epistemology.

Using these definitions one can see how beauty of a unit can be objective. Beauty is NEITHER only in the eye of the beholder NOR is it only in the object, but beauty is a dialectic--it is the objective superposition of the object as a thing (metaphysics) as judged (epistemology) as a unit by the rational beholder. This is how I see it, fire away with comments.
 
  • #6
arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
9,970
134
Hmm..I'd rather take a more humble, empirical approach:
We might regard those elements/features of the world as objectively (or at least intersubjectively) beautiful that all humans find beautiful.

I.e. "objective beauty" is a statistical extreme on a spectrum ending in the other extreme of "objective ugliness".
 
  • #7
1,369
0
Let us try these definitions:

Beauty is a sense of harmony of parts of a unit as viewed by the rational consciousness

A Unit is a thing held in the consciousness as being a member of a group of two or more similar members (thus what exists is not the unit but the thing)

To be Objective is to hold that concepts OF VALUE such as beauty of a unit are a dialectic formed in the human consciousness as: (1) determined by the metaphysical reality of the unit, and (2) as discovered and judged by the epistemology (= reason) of the rational consciousness. Thus to be objective is to hold to a dialectic philosophy that entangles metaphysics and epistemology.

Using these definitions one can see how beauty of a unit can be objective. Beauty is NEITHER only in the eye of the beholder NOR is it only in the object, but beauty is a dialectic--it is the objective superposition of the object as a thing (metaphysics) as judged (epistemology) as a unit by the rational beholder. This is how I see it, fire away with comments.

Can an idea by beautiful? I'm thinking math here... but it would apply across the board.
That is, does objective apply only to physical objects of perception?
 
  • #8
Rade
Can an idea by beautiful? I'm thinking math here... but it would apply across the board.That is, does objective apply only to physical objects of perception?
Well sure an idea can be beautiful. Consider the Einstein Field Equation of General Relativity: [Rµv – ½ gµv R] = [8 pi Tµv]. The left side of the equation describes how the geometry of spacetime is warped and curved by matter--the right side of equation describes the movement of matter in the gravitational field. As stated by physicist John Wheeler, "matter tells spacetime how to curve, and curved space tells matter how to move". This idea, this equation, is objectively beautiful--it is, as I defined in previous post " a sense of harmony of parts of a unit as viewed by the rational consciousness". Here is what Einstein wrote to a friend, Heinrich Zangger, on Nov. 26, 1915 after it was published---"The theory is of incomparable beauty".
 
  • #9
199
0
Some go with a gut feeling, an emotional response. Others a mental reaction.
I think some comparison to the Sapir Whorf hypothesis might make an interesting paper.
 
  • #10
1,369
0
Well sure an idea can be beautiful.

Thats not addressing my question. What you are saying here is that the relationship that exists in nature is beautiful. The equation is not that, the equation is just a symbolic description of part of what exists in nature. And by its very nature your equation is incomplete as it does not fully describe nature. It is therefore not in harmony with 'reality'.

It represents one point of view on nature, which is not objective in any sense. Representations are inherently subjective, since they demand a point of view.
 
  • #11
73
0
I think beauty is objective in the sense that it is subjective.

Objective in an empirical sense in that it could probably be defined per person based off of some physical aspects regarding their brains, and how they perceive with their likes and dislikes. However it is subjective in the sense that it does differ from person to person depending on their dispositions.
 
  • #12
199
0
Can an idea by beautiful? I'm thinking math here... but it would apply across the board.
That is, does objective apply only to physical objects of perception?
A song can make me tear up. Bucky Covington's A Different World
Modern jazz can make me tear up the stereo.

Math might be perfectly capable of making someone come to tears and if so I would say it must be beautiful. Very subjective thing. What makes me want to puke, like 200 lashes for a victim of gang rape, no! Not beautiful.
 
  • #13
Rade
Thats not addressing my question. What you are saying here is that the relationship that exists in nature is beautiful. The equation is not that, the equation is just a symbolic description of part of what exists in nature. And by its very nature your equation is incomplete as it does not fully describe nature. It is therefore not in harmony with 'reality'. It represents one point of view on nature, which is not objective in any sense. Representations are inherently subjective, since they demand a point of view.
No, I am saying that BOTH the equation (which represents the unit) and the relationship (which represents the thing) are beautiful and that this interaction is what makes the concept of beauty objective. Einstein's equation is in perfect harmony with "reality", there is nothing "subjective" about the General Theory of Relativity.
 
  • #14
519
0
Well, I would say that the answer to this question lies in the brain.
Why do humans see things as beautiful, how does the brain do it, and what empirical implications does this have?

I like color by itself, just a pretty color alone or in contrast to other colors, why this is I don't know but I feel drawn to look at it.
 
  • #15
It is universal that everyone desires beauty, perfection, equality....These things along with goodness and morals have no natural place in this universe. There is nothing one can say is absolutely perfect equal or good. But if there is nothing to compare these things to, how can we desire them, or recollect knowledge of an equal or a perfect or of beauty. But I think at a fundamental level of the fabric of space and time these values exist in our subconscious. For naturally but unknowingly or unwillingly our subconscious would guide us towards what is right, what is just, the vary principles of what god stands for. And these pre-existing knowledge’s exist in every one of us. So God, as creator, the perfect being, beauty, and subconscious mind embody the same things. God is our subconscious minds existing in all of us perhaps.
 
  • #16
17
0
Well sure an idea can be beautiful. Consider the Einstein Field Equation of General Relativity: [Rµv – ½ gµv R] = [8 pi Tµv]. The left side of the equation describes how the geometry of spacetime is warped and curved by matter--the right side of equation describes the movement of matter in the gravitational field. As stated by physicist John Wheeler, "matter tells spacetime how to curve, and curved space tells matter how to move". This idea, this equation, is objectively beautiful--it is, as I defined in previous post " a sense of harmony of parts of a unit as viewed by the rational consciousness". Here is what Einstein wrote to a friend, Heinrich Zangger, on Nov. 26, 1915 after it was published---"The theory is of incomparable beauty".

But still... seeing these ideas or objects as harmonious as described above is undeniably subjective and personal, right?
 
  • #17
261
0
pi/4 = 1 - 1/3 + 1/5 - 1/7 + 1/9 - 1/11 +... ==> beauty is objective
 
  • #18
4,465
72
Also, there is the Milli-Helen, the (pseudo) unit of beauty. :smile:

A milli-Helen is the amount of beauty that can launch a single ship.

Source: http://www.mala.bc.ca/~johnstoi/clas101/troy.htm [Broken] Trojan war, queen Helen, renowned for her beauty, was kidnapped, her husband king Menelaus of Sparta had 1000 ships launched to get her back.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #19
17
0
pi/4 = 1 - 1/3 + 1/5 - 1/7 + 1/9 - 1/11 +... ==> beauty is objective

What exactly does this equation represent??? Sorry for the ignorance guys, but it seems that if you are referring to the equation as a whole as beautiful, then that opinion is the result of the subjective nature of beauty; if you are referring to the result as a unit of beauty, then explain why our limited perception of these variables enables us to determine their beauty/harmony?

But I have no idea what I'm talking about with this equation so please do shut me down.
 
  • #20
Rade
But still... seeing these ideas or objects as harmonious as described above is undeniably subjective and personal, right?
No, that is my point.

Again, from my first post here are my working definitions:

Beauty is a sense of harmony of parts of a unit as viewed by the rational consciousness

A Unit is a thing held in the consciousness as being a member of a group of two or more similar members (thus what exists is not the unit but the thing)

When some"thing" (as viewed as a unit by consciousness) is seen as being harmonious (such as the GR equation of Einstein), there is nothing subjective involved--it is a pure objective experience between the harmonious object and your consciousness. You cannot undo the harmonious reality of GR Theory by how you feel about it. It is the difference between saying 'this person is 6 feet tall' and 'I like tall people'. The GR equation of Einstein is an objective idea as is the statement about the height of the person, but it is also a beautiful idea because it describes a sense of harmony between members of a group--matter and space.

I'm sure you have seen overlook areas while driving where random people stop to look at some natural site--why did someone make this a place to stop ?--why do people leave with a sense of seeing something of beauty ? It is because the view itself has an internal objective harmony of many, many things interacting as a whole (such as colors, shapes, rocks, trees, birds, etc) that resonates with any human consciousness as the concept called "beauty". These highway stops are a prime example of objective beauty in action for humans in general.

An act of kindness that you witness can be a thing of objective beauty to you. Why ? There is an internal harmony between the self and other of the two people involved, and you can relate that beauty to how you as a self interact with others around you. I think this a nice way for any specific human to experience the personal rapture of objective beauty.
 
  • #21
261
0
What exactly does this equation represent??? Sorry for the ignorance guys, but it seems that if you are referring to the equation as a whole as beautiful, then that opinion is the result of the subjective nature of beauty; if you are referring to the result as a unit of beauty, then explain why our limited perception of these variables enables us to determine their beauty/harmony?

But I have no idea what I'm talking about with this equation so please do shut me down.

I think that beauty is patterns and symmetries, it is proved that beauty people have simmetric faces, bodys, etc... math is beautyfull because of that... this is what that equation represents, a pattern
 
  • #22
199
0
So good art is beautiful?
 
  • #23
261
0
So good art is beautiful?

the question is: what is "good" art? why some paint is beautiful?
 
  • #25
4
0
Hmm..I'd rather take a more humble, empirical approach:
We might regard those elements/features of the world as objectively (or at least intersubjectively) beautiful that all humans find beautiful.

I.e. "objective beauty" is a statistical extreme on a spectrum ending in the other extreme of "objective ugliness".
What makes you believe only humans have a sense of beauty? Taken into consideration all other possible systems which have a sense of beauty. The intersection of all their sets which contain the elements which they find beautiful would be the empty one by all chance.
 

Related Threads on Is beauty objective?

  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • Last Post
6
Replies
130
Views
25K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Poll
  • Last Post
3
Replies
60
Views
15K
Replies
52
Views
8K
  • Last Post
3
Replies
64
Views
35K
E
  • Poll
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Top