MHB Is \(\bigoplus_\Delta A_\alpha\) a Right Ideal of \(\prod_\Delta R_\alpha\)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rings Section
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book: Rings and Their Modules and am currently focused on Section 2.1 Direct Products and Direct Sums ... ...

I need someone to check my solution to Problem 2(b) of Problem Set 2.1 ...

Problem 2(b) of Problem Set 2.1 reads as follows:
View attachment 8060
My attempt at a solution follows:We claim that $$\bigoplus_\Delta A_\alpha$$ is a right ideal of $$\prod_\Delta R_\alpha$$ Proof ... Let $$(x_\alpha ) , (y_\alpha ) \in \bigoplus_\Delta A_\alpha$$ and let $$(r_\alpha ) \in \prod_\Delta R_\alpha$$Then $$ (x_\alpha ) + (y_\alpha ) = (x_\alpha + y_\alpha )$$ ...

... further ... if $$(x_\alpha )$$ has $$m$$ non-zero components and $$(y_\alpha $$) has $$n$$ non-zero components then $$ (x_\alpha + y_\alpha )$$ has at most $$(m+n)$$ non-zero components ... that is $$ (x_\alpha + y_\alpha )$$ has only a finite number of non-zero components ...

... so ... since each $$x_\alpha + y_\alpha \in A_\alpha$$ we have that $$(x_\alpha + y_\alpha ) \in \bigoplus_\Delta A_\alpha$$ ...

Hence ... $$(x_\alpha ) + (y_\alpha ) \in \bigoplus_\Delta A_\alpha$$ ... ... ... ... ... (1)
Also ... we have ...

$$(x_\alpha ) (r_\alpha ) = (x_\alpha r_\alpha)$$

... and assuming $$x_\alpha$$ has $$m$$ non-zero components, then $$(x_\alpha r_\alpha$$) has at most $$m$$ non-zero components ...... and ...$$x_\alpha r_\alpha \in A_\alpha$$ since $$A_\alpha$$ is a right ideal of $$R_\alpha$$so $$(x_\alpha r_\alpha) \in \bigoplus_\Delta A_\alpha$$and it follows that $$(x_\alpha) ( r_\alpha) \in \bigoplus_\Delta A_\alpha$$ ... ... ... ... ... (2)$$(1) (2) \Longrightarrow \bigoplus_\Delta A_\alpha$$ is a right ideal of $$\prod_\Delta R_\alpha $$
Can someone please critique my proof either by confirming it to be correct and/or pointing out errors and shortcomings ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is correct, Peter.
Why aren't you drinking XXXX in Victoria?
 
steenis said:
This is correct, Peter.
Why aren't you drinking XXXX in Victoria?
THanks Steenis ...

... well, staying with a friend who doesn't drink ...

But had a couple of drinks of whisky and soda last night ... :) ...

Peter
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top