Is black-hole propulsion really feasible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter swampwiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Propulsion
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of black-hole propulsion, outlining three critical steps: creating a small black hole, capturing and redirecting emitted radiation, and ensuring the black hole moves with the spacecraft. The creation of a black hole requires focusing 600 billion kg of energy into a proton's volume, which is currently unachievable with existing technology. Capturing the 160 petawatts of radiation emitted poses significant challenges, and manipulating the black hole's movement through gravitational attraction or electric charge remains largely theoretical. Overall, the consensus is that black-hole propulsion is not feasible with current engineering capabilities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of black hole physics
  • Knowledge of energy concentration techniques
  • Familiarity with radiation capture methods
  • Basic principles of particle manipulation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced energy concentration methods for black hole creation
  • Explore radiation capture technologies and their applications
  • Study gravitational manipulation techniques for small-scale objects
  • Investigate electric charge manipulation of black holes
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, physicists, and researchers interested in theoretical propulsion systems and advanced energy manipulation technologies.

swampwiz
Messages
567
Reaction score
83
Here is a video that dicsusses it, but it sounds awfully science-fictiony to me.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Step 1: Create the small black hole.
You would need to focus 600 billion KG of energy into the volume of a proton. So, for starters, you will need "light" with a wavelength that is not much more than the width of a proton. This is quite a bit more than a hard engineering problem. It is not feasible - with any imaginable technology.

Step 2: Capture and redirect a significant amount of the resulting radiation.
That's the 160 petawatts of power - emitted in the form of anything - perhaps dark matter. If we get very, very lucky, there will be some way to bias the direction that this radiation is emitted so we don't have to work with the radiation except as reaction mass. More likely, it will be not feasible with any foreseeable technology.

Step 3: Make sure that tiny thing moves with the rest of your space craft.
I don't know how you would do this. It would be really tough to do it with gravitational attraction - emitting particles just barely forward of it so their trajectories bend back while pulling the BH forward. You would need a very high current of these particles aimed very precisely so they do not fall into the BH while getting close enough to make a meaningful tug. More likely, you could give the BH an electric charge and manipulate it that way. I might rate this one as potentially feasible.

If you ever did get this to work, you certainly would not let your BH evaporate in the 3.5 years described in the video. You would keep in well fed so that its mass would remain steady.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
In this context a BH would be used as an exquisite fuel tank. A fuel tank to be useful you have to attach it to a vehicle safely and the in- and output must be controlled (yep, this includes the ability to 'shut it down' for some time when you don't need it).
Our physics right now has no idea how to achieve this: our engineering is even less capable. It is safe to say that this idea is just not feasible right now.
 
When considering a new technology, please consider what happen if it fails. Nothing is 100% reliable...
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
12K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K