Is Carbon More Affinity to Chromium or Nickel in Welding?

  • Thread starter Thread starter krautkramer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Carbon
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the affinity of carbon to chromium versus nickel in the context of welding, particularly during dissimilar welding of carbon steel to austenitic stainless steel. Participants explore the reasons behind carbon migration in weld metals and the implications of different filler materials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the necessity and difficulty of comparing the affinities of chromium and nickel to carbon, noting that both metals form various carbides.
  • One participant suggests that carbon migration is more likely when using chromium-rich filler metals compared to nickel-based alloys like Inconel 112 or Inconel 82.
  • Another participant notes that chromium carbides have robust structures, while nickel carbides are more covalent and thermodynamically unstable, which may influence welding outcomes.
  • There is a discussion about the solubility of carbon in different lattice structures, with some participants suggesting that carbon has higher solubility in FCC lattices compared to BCC lattices.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the diffusion rate of carbon in solid metal lattices, citing atomic size as a factor affecting movement.
  • References to literature on delta-ferrite formation and microstructural changes in welding are shared, indicating ongoing research interests among participants.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the affinity of carbon to chromium versus nickel, and multiple competing views remain regarding the mechanisms of carbon migration and the influence of different alloy compositions.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their understanding of the diffusion processes and the structural characteristics of carbides, as well as the complexities of welding different materials.

krautkramer
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Carbon has more affinity to Chromium or Nickel? What is the reason for more affinity to one material over another?

Any help would be highly appreciated.

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi, why do you need to compare the affinities of these metals to carbon? I believe that such a comparison is very difficult to make (apart from being possibly unnecessary), especially because both chromium and nickel form several carbides each.
 
Hi,

During dissimilar welding, for example carbon steel to austenitic stainless steel welding by using austenitic stainless steel (18Cr-8Ni grades) filler wire, the chances of carbon migration from carbon steel to stainless steel weld metal will be high if we use a filler metal contains more chromium.But,the carbon migration will be less if the filler wire is a Nickel base alloy like Inconel 112 or Inconel 82. What is the reason for this phenomena?I am clueless... By the way I have heard that Chromium,vanadium and niobium are strong carbide formers, but Nickel...I have no idea...Any help would be highly appreciated to solve my puzzle.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Hi, I have done a bit of search and it seems that unlike chromium carbides which have very robust metal-like structures, Ni carbides are more covalent and more thermodinamically unstable, and decompose in water and dilute acids. This might explain your welding problem.
 
krautkramer said:
Hi,

During dissimilar welding, for example carbon steel to austenitic stainless steel welding by using austenitic stainless steel (18Cr-8Ni grades) filler wire, the chances of carbon migration from carbon steel to stainless steel weld metal will be high if we use a filler metal contains more chromium.But,the carbon migration will be less if the filler wire is a Nickel base alloy like Inconel 112 or Inconel 82. What is the reason for this phenomena?I am clueless... By the way I have heard that Chromium,vanadium and niobium are strong carbide formers, but Nickel...I have no idea...Any help would be highly appreciated to solve my puzzle.

Thanks
Carbon is readily soluble in liquid Fe, and Cr, V and Nb (and Ta, Ti) are strong carbide formers, and Ni is weak in comparison.

Usually if one wants to weld austenitic steel to carbon steel, it's best to avoid fusion welding and go for diffusion bonding without the melting.
 
Hi All,

Thanks for the valuable inputs and of course astronuc's solubility theory noted.However, I am curious to know whether this phenomena has any connection to the mobility of carbon in B.C.C and F.C.C lattice? In my case both 18Cr-8Ni grade weld metal and Inconel 82 or 182 are believed to be austenitic (F.C.C lattice). On the other hand 18Ni-8Cr contains little bit of delta ferrite (B.C.C lattice) due to F-A mode solidification to avoid solidification cracking but in inconel 82 or 182 the solidification mode is fully austenitic due to it's high nickel percentage. So the delta ferrite in 18Cr-Ni weld metal allowing carbon to move so easily in the stainless steel weld matrix compared to fully austenitic weld metal matrix in inconel?By the way I have heard that carbon has more solubility in F.C.C lattice than B.C.C lattice (For example Fe-Fe3C diagram).So I am little bit confused, Any help would be highly appreciated.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
I do not think carbon has any appreciable rate of diffusion in the solid metal lattice since its atoms are too large to move around like for example hydrogen atoms do. The atomic size of the other alloy components also matters. Moreover, one can expect similar structure phases to have relative affinity to each other, but nickel carbide has an almost covalent hexagonal structure which is not only different from yours but is also thermodynamically unstable (see e.g. http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc71810/m1/1/).
 
Astronuc said:
I was trying to find an article on the kinetics of delta-ferrite formation in welds or melts. So far I'm unsuccessful.


Hope this might help: Delta-Ferrite Formation
 
  • #10
Alkim said:
I do not think carbon has any appreciable rate of diffusion in the solid metal lattice since its atoms are too large to move around like for example hydrogen atoms do. The atomic size of the other alloy components also matters. Moreover, one can expect similar structure phases to have relative affinity to each other, but nickel carbide has an almost covalent hexagonal structure which is not only different from yours but is also thermodynamically unstable (see e.g. http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc71810/m1/1/).
“The crystalline structure of the solvent material is important. For example carbon atoms diffuse faster in BCC iron than in FCC iron under the same carbon concentration gradient, because the atomic packaging is not as dense in the BCC structure. The lower atomic packaging factor in the BCC structure (0.68) as compared to the FCC structure (0.74) allows easier diffusion in BCC lattice.”

http://books.google.co.in/books?id=...diffusion is more in b.c.c than f.c.c&f=false

“BCC more open than FCC for interstitial diffusion.ie,it is easier to move from one interstitial site to another in BCC.But it doesnot say anything about the size or number of interstitial sites in each.actually as you will see FCC has bigger(more) interstitial sites.”

http://www.public.iastate.edu/~bastaw/Courses/MatE271/Week6.pdf
 
  • #11
Alkim said:
Hi, I have done a bit of search and it seems that unlike chromium carbides which have very robust metal-like structures, Ni carbides are more covalent and more thermodinamically unstable, and decompose in water and dilute acids. This might explain your welding problem.

Although there are no stable carbides in the Ni-C (graphite) system, a metastable carbide (Ni3C) can be produced. (67Ruh) found that splat quenching(Approx.106 Deg.C/s) a molten Ni-C alloy produced a highly super saturated FCC phase, along with Ni3C. Subsequent work by (81Ers) facilitated the construction of a metastable equilibrium diagram that incorporated Ni3C,along with a greatly extended solid solution of C fcc(Ni) (fig.2).Major inconsistencies at concentrations greater than 25 at %C between the metastable diagram presented by (81Ers) and (66Pon) have led to the omission of this portion of the diagram in fig.2”

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02881419?LI=true#page-1

By the way, could you explain in which welding process splat quenching occurring??:eek:
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
21K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K