Is Compton Scattering Valid at 180 Degrees?

[snoopies622]

Does the Compton scattering equation

<br /> <br /> \lambda &#039; - \lambda = \frac{h}{m_{e} c} (1-cos \theta )<br /> <br />

work even when \theta = 180^{\circ}?

 

[malawi_glenn]

yeah sure, why shouldn't it?

 

[snoopies622]

I just did a textbook problem which asked for the percentage of a photon's energy that would be passed to an electron via Compton scattering given that it was the maximum amount possible, so I assumed the angle was 180 degrees and my answer did not exactly match the book's answer. Then I wondered if perhaps "scattering" implied a kind of deflection and not a complete rebound.

Maybe the mismatch is just due to rounding..

 

[malawi_glenn]

Maximum transfer to electron is when E_prime is minimum

 

[lightarrow]

I just did a textbook problem which asked for the percentage of a photon's energy that would be passed to an electron via Compton scattering given that it was the maximum amount possible, so I assumed the angle was 180 degrees and my answer did not exactly match the book's answer. Then I wondered if perhaps "scattering" implied a kind of deflection and not a complete rebound.

Maybe the mismatch is just due to rounding..

At 180°, (E-E')/E = a/(1+a)
where:
E = photon's energy before scattering
E' = photon's energy after scattering
a = 2hv/mc^2 (v = photon's frequency before scattering).

The maximun value of (E-E')/E is 100% for: a = +oo, that is for an infinite energy of the photon before scattering.

What did you and your book get, instead?

 

[snoopies622]

The book asks, "for the Compton effect, determine the percentage of energy transferred to the recoil electrons that acquire the maximum kinetic energy when \lambda = 1.21 x 10^{-10}m."

I computed 1-\frac {\lambda}{\lambda &#039;}

where \lambda &#039; = \lambda + \frac{h}{m_0 c}(1-cos \theta )

and \theta = 180^{\circ} since that maximizes 1-cos \theta.

My answer: 3.85% (rounded from 3.85294..)
Book's answer: 3.93%.

 

[jtbell]

For what it's worth, I get 3.86% (rounded from 3.8558%). I used five significant figures for all constants, and did not round off any intermediate steps. I suspect that whoever calculated the book's answer either used less-precise values for the constants, or rounded off one or more intermediate steps.

 

[snoopies622]

I suspect that whoever calculated the book's answer either used less-precise values for the constants, or rounded off one or more intermediate steps.

I guess that happens. Thanks for stepping in. I just looked at the Compton scattering section of another textbook and saw, "the scattered wavelength is angle-dependent and is greatest for scattering in the backward direction (\theta = 180^{\circ})." So there you go.

 

[lightarrow]

I get 3.86% using three significant figures for all constants:

lambda = 1.21*10^(-10) m
m =9.11*10^(-31) kg
c = 3.00*10^8 m/s
h = 6.63+10^(-34) J*s

I get 3.90% if I take m = 9.00*10^(-31) kg