Is converting from MP3 to FLAC worth it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Topher925
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the value of converting audio files from MP3 format to FLAC, particularly in the context of audio quality and the implications of lossy compression. Participants explore the potential for recovering sound quality and the practicality of using CDs versus existing MP3 collections.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether converting from MP3 to FLAC is worthwhile given that MP3 files have already lost quality due to compression.
  • Another participant asserts that quality loss in MP3 is irrecoverable and suggests that starting from CD quality to FLAC is preferable.
  • Some participants express disappointment about having to revert to using CDs for better quality audio.
  • One participant mentions that if using decent headphones and a good bit-rate, continuing with MP3s may be sufficient for casual listening.
  • Another participant claims to have noticed a difference in sound quality when comparing MP3 and WAV formats.
  • One participant reports that converting an MP3 to FLAC showed no improvement in sound quality, while converting from WAV to FLAC resulted in significantly better audio quality.
  • A participant shares their experience of scanning CDs into FLAC format for personal use.
  • Another participant elaborates on the irreversibility of quality loss in MP3 files, comparing it to resizing images where data is permanently lost.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the value of converting MP3 to FLAC, with some asserting that it is not worth it due to irrecoverable quality loss, while others believe that the differences in sound quality can be significant under certain conditions.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying assumptions about audio quality perception based on equipment and listening conditions, and there are unresolved questions about the subjective experience of sound quality across different formats.

Topher925
Messages
1,563
Reaction score
7
So I got a new mp3 player that supports FLAC but all my music is in mp3 form. Is it worth converting from mp3 to FLAC since the audio files have already taken losses when they were converted to mp3? Is there anyway at all to recover compressed mp3 files back to WAV or FLAC quality?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
Not really. Quality is lost with mp3, and it's irrecoverable. It's much better to convert a CD quality sound to FLAC.
 
Thats unfortunate. Looks like I'll have to break out the CDs.
 
Topher925 said:
Thats unfortunate. Looks like I'll have to break out the CDs.

If you only listen to them on headphones and they have a decent bit-rate you can just continue using your mp3's.
 
Yeah but the player supports what ever bit-rate I want and I've got excellent headphones. I tried comparing a song in mp3 and wav format and definitely heard a difference.
 
I tried converting an mp3 file to a FLAC file and did a comparison and there is really no difference in sound quality. :frown: But when I convert from WAV to FLAC, the sound is A-mazing. To bad 99% of my music is in mp3 form.
 
I scanned all my CDs into FLAC, and I serve them up via http://www.subsonic.org/pages/index.jsp" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Topher925 said:
I tried converting an mp3 file to a FLAC file and did a comparison and there is really no difference in sound quality. :frown: But when I convert from WAV to FLAC, the sound is A-mazing. To bad 99% of my music is in mp3 form.

MP3 is a lossy compresison algorithm. Once you have created an MP3 the losses have already taken place (on the MP3 side) and you can't "upconvert" back to the original sound quality.

It's like resizing a 3000*2000 pixel (6 megapixel) image file to 1000*666 pixels (0.6 megapixel). Once you've lost the data, there is no way to "convert" the 0.6 megapixel image back to a 6 megapixel image. However you can take the original 6 megapixel file and resize it to any resolution you like.
 

Similar threads

MP3, WAV, FLAC or APE: which one has the better sound quality?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
More on Distributing High Quality Audio
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Can someone identify this, from some New Orleans piano music?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
MQA is Dead: Lessons in Bad Marketing from Audiophile World
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Modern Digital Audio: Understanding Dither and Oversampling in Hi-Res Age
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
Let's face It: Apple invented personal computers, mp3 players and smart phones
  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
8K
Question of mp3 Being a Lossy Format
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
How Does Expanding a Lossy Compressed File Increase Its Data Size?
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
IPhone 7 and AM push button radios....how did we get here?
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Is Using an iPod as a Primary Storage Device Safe?
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K