Is Cs-137 Effective for Calibrating Vintage Geiger Counters?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mfr1003
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gamma Source
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calibration of a vintage Victoreen CDV-715 Geiger Counter using Cs-137 sources. The user, Mike, highlights the challenge of calibrating the meter, which requires gamma sources, given that Cs-137 has a low probability (5.6%) of decaying into the meta-stable Ba-137 that emits gamma radiation at 0.662 MeV. Mike seeks advice on effectively utilizing Cs-137 for calibration, emphasizing his familiarity with decay models and the need for logical steps before proceeding with the calibration process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of radioactive decay and half-life concepts
  • Familiarity with Geiger Counter operation and calibration
  • Knowledge of gamma radiation and its measurement
  • Experience with decay models and activity calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the calibration procedures for vintage Geiger Counters
  • Learn about the decay characteristics of Cs-137 and Ba-137
  • Investigate alternative gamma sources for Geiger Counter calibration
  • Study the impact of beta decay on gamma detection in Geiger Counters
USEFUL FOR

Radiation safety professionals, physics students, and anyone involved in the calibration and maintenance of Geiger Counters, particularly vintage models.

mfr1003
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
So I have a bit of a story here. First of all, I work in my university's radiation safety department, where, among other things, I calibrate Geiger Counters. I also passed Modern Physics (Physics III), so I got some education on radioactive decay.

I have an old Counter from 1962, a Victoreen CDV-715, the one from the Civilian Defense boxes, model 1A. I replaced the battery, and it works, but it hasn't been calibrated since 1988. I calibrate meters all the time, but I use Cs-137 sources, in the mCi range, when first installed in 1992. My problem is that this meter requires Gamma sources to calibrated, and Cs-137 only has about 5.6% chance to decay the the meta-stable Ba-137, half-life about 3 minutes. Only in meta-stable Barium will it give off gamma radiation, .992 MeV worth. Does anyone who also deals with this stuff have a thought as to how I might go about using the Cs-137 sources to successfully calibrate this old meter? I can got it working, but wouldn't it be neat to get it FUNCTIONAL? Then when I get my hands on other old meters my office is throwing away, I can fix them as well!

I don't have the exact activity from the 6 sources I use to calibrate meters right now, but I can get all that info tomorrow. I'm just not at work right now. I can get their activity at any date, even in the future, as predicted by their decay models. I have all the formulas about activity and decay rates and distances and the like, I just need someone's input to put all these pieces together.

Thanks in advance!

Mike
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry about that

I meant .662 MeV of Gamma decay energy. Mistype. Also, I know that if the counter only picks up Gamma radiation, it won't be affected by the β- decay from the Cs-137, I just want to walk through all this logically before I stick it up on the rolling rack and start shooting rays at it. Also, I do have the manual for it.
 
Last edited:
Well, the direct gamma emission is easy - there is an equilibrium of Ba-137, so 5.6% of the beta-decays lead to a direct gamma decay. On the other hand, your high-energetic electrons can produce gamma rays, too, so you probably get some background.

Wikipedia has different numbers for the decay probabilities.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K