Is Geiger Counter Count Rate Equivalent to Radioactive Source Activity?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the count rate measured by a Geiger counter and the activity of a radioactive source, specifically whether a count rate of 110 counts per second can be equated to an activity of 110 Bq. It also explores how Geiger counters detect gamma radiation compared to other types of radiation, addressing the differences in ionization and detection efficiency.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the count rate cannot be directly equated to activity in Bq without correcting for the efficiency of the Geiger-Müller (GM) counter, particularly for gamma radiation.
  • Others highlight that geometric corrections must also be considered, as the detector may not be exposed to all emitted radiation.
  • It is noted that GM counters are generally more efficient for alpha and beta radiation compared to gamma radiation, but still require various corrections.
  • Participants discuss the mechanisms by which a Geiger counter detects gamma radiation, including the Compton effect and pair production, which produce charged particles that lead to ionization.
  • There is mention of other interactions of gamma radiation, such as the photoelectric effect and multiple atomic ionizations, which can also contribute to detection.
  • One participant raises a scenario where the source and counter are in different locations, questioning the implications for the count rate and activity relationship.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the count rate cannot be directly equated to activity without corrections, but there are differing views on the specifics of these corrections and the efficiency of detection for different types of radiation. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of distance between the source and the counter.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the efficiency of the GM counter for different radiation types, the need for geometric corrections, and the various processes through which gamma radiation interacts with matter, which may not be fully accounted for in all scenarios.

Rohan1997
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
I'm doing high school physics and if a question says something like: A radioactive source gives count rate of 110 counts per second

Can you say that the ACTIVITY is also 110 bq? My second question is how would a gieger counter detect gamma radiation? It is the least ionising of all three radiation so not many particles inside the G-M tube would be ionised giving a low count rate? where as alpha particles would ionise a significant amount more particles then gamma radiation giving a higher count rate?
How would a geiger counter compensate for these different ionising powers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rohan1997 said:
Can you say that the ACTIVITY is also 110 bq?

No. Not for any radiation. If you desire activity in Bq then the count rate must be corrected for the efficiency of the GM counter. GM counter are not very efficient for gamma and the efficiency depends on the energy. Also geometric corrections must be made since the detector only is exposed to some of the disintigrating radiation. This is called a solid angle correction.

For beta and alpha radiation the efficiency is much higher but there are still corrections that have to be made . The window of the detector must be thin to allow the particles into the sensitive volume. Even thin mylar or mica window do absorb some of these particles. Also depending on how close the detector is to the sample you need to consider radiation that is emitted away from the detector but is backscattered into it.

So using a GM counter is not a direct reading instrument for activity. It is better for radiation exposure measurement but still must be calibrated for different energies.

The amount of ionization per particle results in one count. It just has to be large enough to initiate the avalanche process by which the electric pulse are produced.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Rohan1997 said:
Can you say that the ACTIVITY is also 110 bq?
What happens if the source and the counter are in different rooms, as extreme example?

Rohan1997 said:
My second question is how would a gieger counter detect gamma radiation?
Hope for a conversion to a high-energetic electron (Compton effect) or pair creation, both produce charged particles that lead to ionization. A gamma photon that does not get converted in or before the detector does not get detected.
 
mfb said:
Hope for a conversion to a high-energetic electron (Compton effect) or pair creation, both produce charged particles that lead to ionization. A gamma photon that does not get converted does not get detected.

Gamma radiation interacts via other less energetic processes as multiple atomic ionizations, Photo electric effect and Compton effects releasing more less energetic electrons and low energy x-rays.
 
And nuclear photoeffect, photodisintegration and so on.
The concept of all those processes is the same - the photon transfers energy to a very small number of charged particles (typically electrons and/or positrons), and those are detected in the Geiger counter.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K