Is Dark Matter Just a Reflection of Our Flawed Theories?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DecayProduct
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the validity of dark matter and dark energy theories in astrophysics. Participants argue that the observed motions of galaxies suggest a need for additional mass, leading to the hypothesis of dark matter composed of WIMPs. However, skepticism arises regarding the scientific rigor of these theories, with some suggesting that flawed observations or theories of gravity may better explain the phenomena. The conversation highlights the tension between established theories and the need for new explanations in light of ongoing astronomical observations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational theory and its implications in astrophysics.
  • Familiarity with dark matter concepts, specifically WIMPs (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles).
  • Knowledge of observational evidence such as the Bullet Cluster and cosmic microwave background data.
  • Basic grasp of quantum mechanics and its relation to cosmological theories.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Bullet Cluster observations on dark matter theories.
  • Explore the concept of MOND (Modified Newtonian Dynamics) as an alternative to dark matter.
  • Investigate the role of dark energy in the accelerating expansion of the universe.
  • Study the latest advancements in particle physics related to dark matter detection methods.
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students of cosmology interested in the ongoing debates surrounding dark matter and dark energy theories.

  • #31
Jules18 said:
But for lack of a better way of saying it in my limited vocabulary - Seriously? Dark matter? Come on.
Please come up with something better. I assure you, everybody tries, but it's not like dark matter has been an easy guess.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #32
Dark matter is a drop dead easy answer. It's the only solution that makes sense without throwing theoretical physics, as we know it, out on its head. It's possible all our theories of physics are fundamentally flawed, but, unlikely.
 
  • #33
Chronos said:
Dark matter is a drop dead easy answer.
Technically maybe. But I meant it was not easily accepted historically.
 
  • #34
There was a time where these additions to gravity were attributed to the local nature of space. Recall \Lambda, Einstein's cosomological constant. Then it became thought ambiguous. Now it seems wholly attributed to something of particle nature. Is this correct, or is

R_{\mu \nu} - \frac{1}{2}Rg_{\mu \nu} + D_{\mu \nu} = 8 \pi G T_{\mu \nu}

still an option, where D is a attribute of the vacuum?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
495
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K