Is doing a dual masters worth it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BigFlorida
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dual Masters
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and value of pursuing a dual master's degree in engineering and physics, particularly in the context of a participant's academic trajectory towards a PhD in nuclear physics. The conversation explores the implications of obtaining two separate master's degrees concurrently versus sequentially, as well as the motivations behind such a decision.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses interest in obtaining two separate master's degrees, one in electrical engineering and the other in nuclear physics, and questions the feasibility and worth of this path.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on what is meant by "dual masters," asking if it refers to a single degree incorporating both disciplines or two distinct degrees.
  • A participant suggests that pursuing two course-based master's degrees concurrently might be manageable but raises concerns about the time commitment and the practicality of completing thesis-based programs simultaneously.
  • There is a suggestion that if the ultimate goal is a PhD in nuclear physics, it may be more beneficial to apply directly to PhD programs after completing undergraduate studies, rather than pursuing an engineering master's for employability reasons.
  • One participant acknowledges the advice received and reflects on their motivations, indicating uncertainty about their academic goals and a desire to evaluate options.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the practicality and value of pursuing dual master's degrees. While some see potential benefits, others question the necessity and feasibility of such an endeavor, leading to an unresolved discussion on the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various factors that could influence the decision, such as the nature of the master's programs (course-based vs. thesis-based), time commitments, and the relevance of engineering education to future career goals. There is also an acknowledgment of personal motivations and uncertainties regarding academic direction.

BigFlorida
Messages
41
Reaction score
1
I am currently finishing up my undergraduate degrees (in physics and mathematics) and would very much like to do a dual masters in engineering and physics (eventually going on to get my physics PhD). Is this feasible and/or worth it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by a "dual masters" degree? And where are you interested in doing it?

Are you talking about a degree that incorporates aspects of both disciplines or are you talking about two separate degrees?
 
@Choppy I mean I am planning on obtaining two separate Master's degrees, one in electrical engineering and the other in nuclear physics. I am interested in doing it at wherever I may be able to do both degrees concurrently (if it is even possible to do such a thing anywhere), preferably MIT or a similar school. Afterwards, I plan on getting my PhD in nuclear physics.
 
I would really just like to know if it is possible/worth it and/or if anyone has done it or something similar.
 
Also, I should add: by the time I graduate, I will have had all the EE undergrad courses completed that are offered at my university. Unfortunately I do not have time to take any other engineering courses that would complete a minor in the field.
 
I don't see what the point would be in doing two master's degrees at the same time, but a lot can depend on the details. For example, if you're into two course-based master's degrees that would probably be fine. It would likely take you twice as long to finish that as it would a single degree and so it wouldn't make much of a difference - after about four years you would have two degrees whether you did them in serial or parallel. If you're thinking you can somehow squeeze twice as much work into your time as anyone else and complete such an objective early... well it's not impossible, but you should have a solid, evidence-based reason for believing that you could do something like that.

If you're talking about thesis-based master's programs, that's a different ball of wax. You would likely have a difficult time convincing your supervisor that you should have multiple projects.

And if your final goal is a PhD in nuclear physics, and since you're talking about US programs, it would seem to make more sense to just apply to nuclear physics PhD programs at the completion of your undergrad. If the EE master's is purely for employability purposes, it would make more sense to cross that bridge when you come to it. If you complete a PhD and feel that you need engineering-specific education to get a job doing what you want, that would be the appropriate time to re-train both because it would be based on the current market and in principle give you an up-to-date education.
 
@Choppy That makes a lot of sense. I suppose there is not really an upshot to doing both, in some ways I just want to prove to myself that I can handle it. I appreciate the advice and think I will just go for the nuclear physics PhD program. I guess I do not know what I want just yet and am just evaluating all of my options.

Thank you again.
 

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
4K